1. This was intented for the future html spec. I'm sure I'm not the only
one questioning this issue.
2. Others didn't have any trouble understanding me.
3. This list is open to everyone, I shot out a question and I got many
replies, so thank you all.
Reporting a problem you are not sure
The DOM work was fake, but if you insist, here you have some fake SAX work:
Sub PrintOption(value, selected, text)
Const tagName = OPTION
Dim attrs(3)
Attrs(0) = value
Attrs(1) = value
If value = selected Then Attrs(2) = selected
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Alex Vincent wrote:
For disabled or readonly controls, the (required) attribute has no
effect.
What does this mean? The missingValue bit of validityState is either on
or off. Do I need to change the required bit if we're disabled? Or
should I leave it alone?
I
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Arve Bersvendsen wrote:
In chapter 8.2 of the WF2 draft,
URL:http://whatwg.org/specs/web-forms/current-work/#relation
additional CSS pseudo-classes are specified. Are file upload controls
left out of the definition of :in-range and :out-of-range on purpose, or
is it
Google Chrome has SNI because it uses WinHTTP for HTTPS connections
and WinHTTP supports SNI.
Adam
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:33 AM, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Aaron Swartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're thinking of SNI:
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
The required= attribute doesn't apply to selects in the current
draft of WF2. As an author I'd expect it to apply to select.
I've seen a case where a select is used and the user is required to
change its value, as in:
select name=test
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Ric Hardacre wrote:
[scriplets] need to check that they're running on a compatible scripting
engine, just checking for the existence of document.getElementById is
the simple way (If there are better ways then I'm always open to
learning). But I'm presented with an
Many times I've set SELECT.selectedIndex to -1 to have the effect of an
invalid starter value; I think this is a case where the REQUIRED attribute
would make sense. If a SELECT has a REQUIRED attribute, and
SELECT.selectedIndex == -1, then the control would be considered invalid.
It would also
On Oct 14, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
There is no way to say loop forever right now primarily because
doing so
would mean complicating the syntax of the playcount attribute to be
not
just a number. You can work around it with script (just add
onended=currentTime=0 to the video
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Eric Carlson wrote:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Chris Double wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not the question. The question is whether the looping
attributes are
needed at all. It seems that there's
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Joao Eiras wrote:
Although WebForm2 provides automatic validation of form content from the
UA side, the specification has a few gaps related to customizablility of
notifications, by web authors, without scripting enabled.
If the user fills a form in an improper way
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Eric Carlson wrote:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Chris Double wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's not the question. The question
On Oct 23, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
This use case is definitely something we want to consider, but I don't
think it's about required=. It's about an option in the select
being a
non-option (as it were). select by definition can't have nothing
selected. That's what it means.
The
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Andy Lyttle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2008, at 5:31 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
This use case is definitely something we want to consider, but I don't
think it's about required=. It's about an option in the select being a
non-option (as it were).
This are just my thoughts, however I feel they are worth sharing:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can call setCustomValidity() to set a specific string.
Joao explicitly asked for a way to achieve this **without scripting
enabled**. I think it's quite
Am Donnerstag, den 23.10.2008, 23:02 +0100 schrieb Eduard Pascual:
Would having some sort of custom-error-message attribute hurt that
much? (Of course, the name is just an example, and I wouldn't really
suggest it). It would simply ignored by current UAs, and not really
hard to implement
On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
Ultimately the display of the hint is, and should be, up to the UA,
so that non-full-featured devices can display things in a maximally
helpful way to the user. Within the context of a standard browser
on an ordinary computer, though, the
17 matches
Mail list logo
