Jonas,
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Can you suggest changes to the WS protocol that would make it a better
> general-purpose protocol?
There were several threads on the IETF HYBI mailing list with some such
proposals:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/maillist.html
An example of
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> Wellington Fernando de Macedo wrote:
>>
>>> "message segmentation" (...) aren't much important in
>>> bidirectional-communication.
>> No. I'm wrong. Because of virtual connections "message segmentation" is
>> necessary.
>>
>>
>> I think WS cou
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Wellington Fernando de
Macedo wrote:
> Hi, I've looked at the BWTP proposal. My feedback is here :)
One thing that I was curious to get your input on is: Does the fact
that BWTP syntax looks a lot like HTTP make implementing a BWTP client
in gecko any easier? I.e.
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:
>
> I think CSSOM says font names should be quoted.
Oops, fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take lon
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Michael Nordman wrote:
>
> How empty attribute values are handled in the section
> 9.2.5.5 may want some massaging.
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/syntax.html#parser-appcache
>
> > If the Document is being loaded as part of navigation of a
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, narendra sisodiya wrote:
>
> most of the traffic of university hostel's and home users goes for
> streaming media like YouTube. And most of the time we are connected
> behind proxy for example my institute use squid proxy. But as per my
> knowledge, squid is not successful t
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Bil Corry wrote:
>
> Under section 2.7 Character encodings[1], there are two [CHARMOD] links,
> both of which appear to be broken.
Thanks. Fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2009, 00:05 + schrieb Ian Hickson:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:26 + schrieb Ian Hickson:
> > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I second that motion, not only as owner of a smar
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 00:26 + schrieb Ian Hickson:
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
> > >
> > > I second that motion, not only as owner of a smartphone, but also as
> > > someone with webspace that has a volume cap.
Wellington Fernando de Macedo wrote:
>
>> "message segmentation" (...) aren't much important in
>> bidirectional-communication.
> No. I'm wrong. Because of virtual connections "message segmentation" is
> necessary.
>
>
> I think WS could support these features (like they are specified in the
>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> On 10/08/2009 04:05, Remco wrote:
>> But Elephants Dream may not be a good example for a video where an alt
>> text would be useful. It's simply too complicated to replace with
>> alternative text. But if you have a short video that e
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure how to expose the presence of data during the drag,
> > though.
>
> I think we currently list "application/x-moz-file" in the .types
> property. Obviously we'd like to use a better type than that. Could we
> simply use "application/
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Aaron Whyte wrote:
>
> It'd be a lot better to have a JS API to capture new URLs.
We actually had this in an earlier version, but we removed it based on
feedback from browser vendors that it was too much at once. I expect we'll
readd this feature in due course.
--
Ian Hick
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Sebastian Markb�ge wrote:
>
> The spec should explicitly specify which MouseEvent properties are
> available during the various drag events to avoid assumptions.
The spec requires them to all be set on all drag events, currently.
> This issue is related to whether or not a
2009/8/11 Nils Dagsson Moskopp :
> Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 00:44 +0100 schrieb Sam Kuper:
>> In recent news, Google may be about to open source On2 codecs, perhaps
>> creating a route out of the HTML 5 video codec deadlock:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/06/google_vp6_open_source/
>
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:42:36 -0400, Remco wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Benjamin
Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On 10/08/2009 04:05, Remco wrote:
A title is a short description, and could be the movie title in the
case of a video element.
WCAG 2 1.1.1 requires that:
"If non-text content is
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:37:15 -0400, Bil Corry wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote on 8/6/2009 2:24 PM:
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:12:07 -0400, Manu Sporny
wrote:
The test ensures that attributes originating in the markup of an HTML4
document are preserved by the HTML parser and are preserved in
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Max Romantschuk wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been off the list for quite some time, so bear with me if I missed
> something searching the archives.
>
> I've been looking at the meter element, which specifically states that
> "There is no explicit way to specify u
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 07:27 + schrieb Ian Hickson:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:59:11 +0200, Julian Reschke
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > - the literal letters
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:59:11 +0200, Julian Reschke
> > > wrote:
> > > > > - the literal letters T and Z must be uppercase
> > > > Any technical reason why they have to?
> > > Any
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:59:11 +0200, Julian Reschke
wrote:
- the literal letters T and Z must be uppercase
Any technical reason why they have to?
Any reason why they don't?
It simplifies processing a tiny amount.
So for a t
21 matches
Mail list logo
