On Jul 2, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Any site which does that has a giant security hole, since Flash can be used
> to arbitrarily script the embedding page. It's about as safe as allowing
> embedding of arbitrary off-site
On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:09 PM, John Harding wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> > As several people pointed out (and which I tried to get at in my post), this
> > is really an ecosystem issue rather than a change needed in the spec or in
> > browsers. I suspect it
On 2 July 2010 14:28, Aral Balkan wrote:
> Hi Marques,
>
> I'm an interaction designer/developer, not a rocket scientist. :) A
> meta tag, I can easily add. If you start talking about HTTP headers,
> you've lost me.
>
> i.e., this is meant to be a pragmatic, easy-to-author solution.
I think this
On 2010-07-02 21:01, John Harding wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Lachlan Huntwrote:
Correct. Vendors can theoretically implement any codec or container they
like, with any features or limitations they like.
MP4 already has various DRM schemes in use...
I would still, however, argue aga
Hello!!!
I just uploaded a photo on nandhu_mdf's DailyFlog page that I want you to see.
Check out:
http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/nandhu_mdf/67426545&stc=82
Cheers!
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging spac
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Aryeh Gregor
> wrote:
> > As several people pointed out (and which I tried to get at in my post),
> this
> > is really an ecosystem issue rather than a change needed in the spec or
> in
> > browsers. I suspect it's going to take some time, but the flexibility of
>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> On 2010-07-02 13:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> On 02.07.2010 13:38, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200, Shane Fagan
>>> wrote:
Well this isnt really a list where we should talk about the dos and
>>>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> On 2010-07-02 13:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>> On 02.07.2010 13:38, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>>> Whether playing video requires a plugin is very much an issue for this
>>> list, I think. What Henri explained -- not having lock-in to a
>>> p
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Aral Balkan wrote:
> I just submitted a proposal for a new meta tag to flag that
> high-resolution images are available and should be loaded in place of
> low-resolution ones for users with high-PPI displays (like the new
> iPhone 4's Retina display).
>
> Please see
Also related discussion, where I proposed something similar on WHATWG:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatwg@lists.whatwg.org/msg21565.html
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Kevin Carle wrote:
>
> One part of (2) [well, debatably part, but rel
> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 18:11 -0700, David Singer wrote:
> > I think it's interesting to look at these and ask to what extent they are
> > in scope.
> >
> > > 1. Standard video format
> > > 2. Robust video streaming
> > > 3. Content Protection
> > > 4. Encapsulation + embedding
> > > 5. Fullscreen
Hi Marques,
I'm an interaction designer/developer, not a rocket scientist. :) A
meta tag, I can easily add. If you start talking about HTTP headers,
you've lost me.
i.e., this is meant to be a pragmatic, easy-to-author solution.
Thanks,
Aral
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Marques Johansson wr
The idea or returning a single image for a URI that points at a video
has indeed been discussed. It is not possible to do with a URI
fragment, since a URI fragment (#) can only return the same mime type
as the main URI. But the suggestion for this is to use a URI query.
Then, it is possible to retu
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Aral Balkan wrote:
> ...
> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions#Proposals
"In this case, the developer would provide 2x, 4x, and 8x versions of all
images. So, in the running example, she would make flower.jpg, flo...@2x.jpg,
flo...@4x.jpg, and"
And what if
On 2010-07-02 13:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 02.07.2010 13:38, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200, Shane Fagan
wrote:
Well this isnt really a list where we should talk about the dos and
donts of web content distribution. DRM content can be embedded in the
video tag an
I just submitted a proposal for a new meta tag to flag that
high-resolution images are available and should be loaded in place of
low-resolution ones for users with high-PPI displays (like the new
iPhone 4's Retina display).
Please see:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions#Proposals
(Curre
If there were hooks for handling the bytes being requested and
supplied to the media object, would you agree that DRM modules could
be written with Javascript (if a bit of a straw man - as all DRM is
perceived to varying degrees)? I think this could prevent the need for
some plugins.
On Fri, Jul 2
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:38 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200, Shane Fagan
> wrote:
> > Well this isnt really a list where we should talk about the dos and
> > donts of web content distribution. DRM content can be embedded in the
> > video tag and decoded using
On 02.07.2010 13:38, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200, Shane Fagan
wrote:
Well this isnt really a list where we should talk about the dos and
donts of web content distribution. DRM content can be embedded in the
video tag and decoded using installable plugins so its n
Hi!
I would like to invite you to visit MyDailyFlog and see my latest photos.
Check out:
http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/nandhu_mdf/67426545&stc=16
Cheers!
nanda kumar
Got a digital camera?
MyDailyFlog is a personal photo-blogging spac
Hi!
I would like you to come and see my latest photos on MyDailyFlog.
Check out:
http://www.mydailyflog.com/go/invite_register/nandhu_mdf/67426545&stc=71
Thanks!
nanda kumar
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
To unsubscribe of this type of email from MyDailyFlog in the future,
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:13:00 +0200, Shane Fagan
wrote:
Well this isnt really a list where we should talk about the dos and
donts of web content distribution. DRM content can be embedded in the
video tag and decoded using installable plugins so its not really an
issue for this list I dont think.
If the seek method was further hookable it should be possible to add decrypt
or transcode methods to interpret the fetched content, possibly requesting
more data to the filter stream bucket, before apending the bytes of media.
On Jul 2, 2010 6:10 AM, "Marques Johansson" wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 20
A point in time, if it relates to an I-frame, is very small set and it
represents an image.
It would be interesting to have
or animated images in the sense of:
I think the earlier post was looking to display video thumbnails using
this sort of fragment notation.
If the video wasn't being play
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 02:37 -0700, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> "John Harding" wrote:
>
> > Rather than ask browsers to get into the DRM
> > business,
> > what I think would work best is having a means for 3rd party DRM
> > providers
> > to supply browser plug-ins which implement the tag for
> > prote
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:59 PM, John Harding wrote:
> 2. Robust Video Streaming
> Andy Berkheimer on our team has been putting some thought into this, so I'll
> defer to him for more specific proposals. For an app like YouTube, it is
> extremely useful to have fine-grained control over how the br
"John Harding" wrote:
> Rather than ask browsers to get into the DRM
> business,
> what I think would work best is having a means for 3rd party DRM
> providers
> to supply browser plug-ins which implement the tag for
> protected
> content - not all that different than selecting a pluggable codec
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Actually, a point in time is nothing - it's an empty set. You never
> want to actually point to a point in time, but rather to either the
> point in time and an interval after that point in time, or everything
> from that point onwards. That
Actually, a point in time is nothing - it's an empty set. You never
want to actually point to a point in time, but rather to either the
point in time and an interval after that point in time, or everything
from that point onwards. That's what these URIs represent.
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2
Hello,
The Flash player exposes a string of metrics:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/AS3LCR/Flash_10.0/flash/net/NetStreamInfo.html
The most useful ones are:
*) droppedFrames: it can be used to determine whether the client can play the
video without stuttering.
*) maxBytesPerSecond: it can be used
30 matches
Mail list logo
