On 7/7/10 5:43 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
I hear this every so often. Do we really need the spec to double as a
browser stress test? I mean, there are actual test suites nowadays. I
just want to read the spec.
I'll just note that part of the reason it's a "stress test", apart from
the old Firefo
On 7/7/10 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
The problem is that that whatwg page causes freezes and crashes in Firefox.
May I recommend trying out Firefox 4 beta 1? ;)
-Boris
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
>>> charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the
On 7/7/10, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith
> wrote:
>> This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
>> charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the HTML 5 spec
>> please remove that?
>>
>>
>> The problem is that that whatwg pa
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>> This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
>> charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the HTML 5 spec
>> please remove that?
>>
>>
>> The problem is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
> charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the HTML 5 spec
> please remove that?
>
>
> The problem is that that whatwg page causes freezes and crashes in Firefox. i
This is about the fourth time I've said it here. Can the person in
charge of writing the slow and buggy ajvascript on the HTML 5 spec
please remove that?
The problem is that that whatwg page causes freezes and crashes in Firefox. i
When it doesn't throw errors, it freezes Firefox.
This is is u
Ok - sounds like pretty much unanimous objection to the idea of DRM plugins
being instantiated via tag. I'll still be pushing on the DRM plugin
providers to implement an interface that mimics the tag - my primary
goal is to be able to have a single player implementation independent of
whether or
MySpace is my canonical example - they allow arbitrary SWFs to be embedded
in profiles, but not s. Flash added support a while back that
allows containing pages to block SWFs from executing script or accessing the
contents of the page, which MySpace enforces by rewriting the tag
that users post.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Marques Johansson wrote:
> I tested cutting off the HTTP connection and browsers didn't handle this.
You mean they didn't stop playing the video and trigger an error event
that JavaScript can handle? What did they do?
> and found that browsers do not attempt to r
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> Could you explicitly call the _self target in links in the frame? I wasn't
> sure if the target attribute was going or not, but I'd expect target="_self"
> to override the default seamless action.
It doesn't. The iframe is considered par
>
> Yes, the browser disconnects, and scripts have no influence over it. With
> preload="metadata" implemented, it should disconnect as soon as possible
> after getting enough data for the first frame. For preload="auto", it will
> disconnect after buffering X seconds of data. If you need more gran
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Schalk Neethling
wrote:
> Hi there everyone
>
I loved this firefox release (4 beta) very much because it support SVG
animations.
Tons of Thanks..
--
┌─┐
│Narendra Sisodiya
│http://narendrasisodiya.com
└─┘
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/7/10 4:43 AM, Schalk Neethling wrote:
>>
>> Ah, ok. I see but then I wonder what the problem is with regards to
>> Youtube
>> and full screen as their full screen mode is fully user driven.
>
> The problem is that Youtube disables the bro
On 7/7/10 4:43 AM, Schalk Neethling wrote:
Ah, ok. I see but then I wonder what the problem is with regards to Youtube
and full screen as their full screen mode is fully user driven.
The problem is that Youtube disables the browser context menu for the
video (for various reasons) and that from
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:36:30 +0200, Markus Ernst wrote:
I tried to read about CORS, but did not understand the whole of it. Can
CORS be set up via server-side scripting, with PHP or whatever? Then it
will be an acceptable solution, and sooner or later libraries will be
available for both th
Am 06.07.2010 12:31 schrieb Aryeh Gregor:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Markus Ernst wrote:
Thank you and Boris for your examples. I see the security issues. Anyway It
would be very helpful in cases like mine, where security and privacy are not
affected, to get an easy way to do this opt-in w
Am 06.07.2010 22:41 schrieb Ashley Sheridan:
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:17 -0400, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Markus Ernst mailto:derer...@gmx.ch>> wrote:
> My problem is this sentence in the spec for seamless: "This will cause links
> to open in the parent browsing context
The problem is that YouTube's fullscreen button doesn't actually make the
video full screen, so it doesn't take advantage of the hardware accelerated
fullscreen video in Firefox 4. There's no generic API for allowing web pages
to create skinned HTML 5 players with a "click to fullscreen" button.
O
Ah, ok. I see but then I wonder what the problem is with regards to Youtube
and full screen as their full screen mode is fully user driven.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Barth [mailto:w...@adambarth.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 1:22 PM
To: Schalk Neethling
Cc: whatwg
Subject: Re: [
Could not agree more Anne
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org]
On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 1:38 PM
To: Henri Sivonen; Shane Fagan
Cc: Andy Berkheimer; John Harding; wha...@whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [
I'm sure they keep using HTML5 video in full screen. The issues
around full screen relate to letting the page trigger full screen.
It's fine for the user to trigger it directly.
Adam
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Schalk Neethling
wrote:
> Hi there everyone,
>
>
>
> Downloaded and installed t
Hi there everyone,
Downloaded and installed the first beta of Firefox 4. To the folks at
Mozilla that is on here, what an awesome job. Love the new look and it IS
very fast. The reason I mention Firefox 4 is because, on the welcome screen
you get after installing the browser, you have the optio
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:42:22 +0200, Marques Johansson
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:24:45 +0200, Marques Johansson <
marq...@displague.com> wrote:
Some UAs request video without sending "Range: bytes 0-". The server
has
no
way
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:19:42 +0200, Marques Johansson
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Aryeh Gregor
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Marques Johansson
wrote:
> The benefit to the user is that they could have less open network
> connections while streaming video from server
25 matches
Mail list logo
