On 12/20/10 5:16 PM, Alex Komoroske wrote:
But I think overall the discussion about precisely what a tab means is
not central to the core proposal. Is that reasonable?
Yep.
-Boris
Hi Bjartur,
Thanks for your comments. My responses are inline.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 12/20/10, Alex Komoroske wrote:
> > Thanks for your comments. I've replied inline.
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On
Ah, yes, thank you Boris, I think I understand now.
Note that the actual proposal doesn't depend on the existence of a UI
construct called "tabs" that operate like they do on desktop browsers today.
I think the better way to think about it is, if the content of the page is
partially visible on *a
This type of request (see forwarded message below) to utilize the
application cache for subresource loads into documents that are not stored
in the cache has come up several times now. The current feature set is very
focused on the "offline" use case. Is it worth making additions such that a
docume
On 12/20/10, Alex Komoroske wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. I've replied inline.
>
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:27:51 -, Alex Komoroske
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the fact that background tabs aren't necessarily invisible:
>>>
At 9:56 PM + 12/18/10, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:42:52 -, Diogo Resende
>wrote:
>>
>>- Does the OS need to know how to fetch this information?
>Yes, the purpose of an OS is to abstract and multiplex hardware.
>Does a web app need to know how to fetch this informati
On 12/20/10 10:21 AM, Alex Komoroske wrote:
I'm not sure that I understand the point of confusion. When I say
'tab', I mean the current UI construct implemented in Firefox, Safari,
Chrome, Opera, Internet Explorer, and others.
I think the point of confusion is that you think this UI construct
Replied inline..
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 21:56 +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:42:52 -, Diogo Resende
> wrote:
>
> > Let's think about an example, perhaps a bluetooth weather station. For
> > the OS it's just another bluetooth device. What if a web app could have
>
Hi Bjartur,
Thanks for your comments. I've replied inline.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:27:51 -, Alex Komoroske
> wrote:
>
>> Regarding the fact that background tabs aren't necessarily invisible:
>> -
>>
>> On December 8, Boris Zb
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:42:09 +0100, Henry Chan
wrote:
*bump*
This is really serious, it blocks a very good use of the API, and it's
unreliable to use it if back and forward is clicekd before onload.
This got fixed, no?
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5685&to=5686
--
Anne van
10 matches
Mail list logo