Re: [whatwg] Ongoing work on an editing commands (execCommand()) specification

2011-03-18 Thread Tim Down
On 18 March 2011 00:43, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Tim Down timd...@gmail.com wrote: I'm interested in this stuff and am very grateful for your work. I've been writing a document.execCommand() replacement for my Rangy library

Re: [whatwg] Form input element for value-unit pairs

2011-03-18 Thread Christoph Päper
Markus Ernst: Am 15.03.2011 17:36 schrieb Christoph Päper: input name=fontsize type=number unit=typo datalist id=typo option value=2.835 label=pt option value=1 label=mm /datalist What I do not yet understand is, in what point does this proposal enhance usability compared

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 05:45, Ian Hickson wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Jonathan Dixon wrote: Further, it could be useful to provide a way to query the video source as to whether the camera is oriented relative to the screen (if the underlying system knows; consider a phone device with both a main camera

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Olli Pettay
On 03/18/2011 04:02 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: There is a plan of allowing direct assigning to IDL attributes besides creating URLs. I.e. being able to do: audio.src = blob (The src content attribute would then be something like about:objecturl.)

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, device, and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 15:14, Olli Pettay wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:02 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: This is basically what Philip and I were discussing in the other thread yesterday, where we avoid the unnecessary overhead of creating a magic URL, and instead just assign the object directly to the src

[whatwg] Proposal for @label attribute associated with kind=metadata TimedTextTracks

2011-03-18 Thread Eric Winkelman
Use Case: Many video streams contain in-band metadata for application signaling, and other uses. By using this metadata, a web page can synchronize an application with the delivered video, or provide other synchronized services. An example of this type of metadata is EISS (

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote: So, the salt and the nonce play different roles. The salt is to make sure the message appears random if you haven't read the spec (and so don't know the salt). The nonce is to prevent the attacker from crafting plaintexts

[whatwg] Contradictory description of online whitelist prefixes

2011-03-18 Thread Nikolas Coukouma
Section 6.6.2 Application caches says Zero or more URLs that form the online whitelist namespaces. These are used as prefix match patterns, and declare URLs that the user agent will never load from the cache but will instead always attempt to obtain from the network. The above doesn't seem

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for @label attribute associated with kind=metadata TimedTextTracks

2011-03-18 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Eric Winkelman e.winkel...@cablelabs.com wrote: Use Case: Many video streams contain in-band metadata for application signaling, and other uses.  By using this metadata, a web page can synchronize an application with the delivered video, or provide other

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote: It's possible that ICE doesn't actually negotiate this securely, since the STUN server itself is untrusted. Do you (or anyone else) know if STUN negotiation is secure under these circumstances? Or do you think it doesn't matter? The other ICE

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: The other ICE peer, the STUN server, the TURN server (if any), and the signaling channel are all under the control of the attacker in a worst case scenario (the user being directed to a hostile or hijacked site). The attacker

[whatwg] CSS5 anyone? Or a WHATWG CSS3 Working Group would be cool too

2011-03-18 Thread Martin Alterisio
I hope I'm not stepping on a tabooed topic here... It's just that I wish that someone would do to CSS what you guys did to HTML. I respect the work being done by the W3C CSS Working Group but it just doesn't fell enough. It doesn't feel open enough, nor fast enough. I really want to see a