On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> The following is how I understand your requirements; please correct me where
> correction is due.
> You've got two types of resources:
>
> 1. static resources, to be retrieved once and cached indefinitely
> 2. dynamic resources, to be
I think there's a valid use case for downloading a script and not
evaluating it immediately.
I think we all agree on that.
Boris-
I wish that were true, at this point, but I'm not sure that it is. The tone
I got from Ian's post (and even subsequent replies) was that he in fact does
not see t
If browsers processed (parsed & compiled) scripts in a background thread
it would mitigate the problem, but not solve it. Suppose I have 100K of
JS I need right now to generate the DOM for the initial page, and I have
another 500K of JS that's only needed if the user clicks on FeatureX.
Assuming
This isn't practical if the contents of the
Sorry for repetition, but we can already preload images and CSS and apply
them to the page at an arbitrary point in time. Why wouldn't we want the
same thing for JavaScript?
I think the question is whether you want _more_ than that for JavaScript.
For images, you can preload them and choose wh
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2011, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >
> > Can you put a note in the spec that we're thinking of changing this
> > behavior, so developers are less likely to start depending on it, and
> > we've got some cover in case it breaks some
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> Behavior for Enter in contenteditable in current browsers seems to be
> as follows:
>
> * IE9 wraps all lines in (including if you start typing in an
> empty text box). If you hit Enter multiple times, it inserts empty
> s. Shift-Enter inse
[Apologies for being out of the loop on this thread thus far, as I was one
of the main proponents of it earlier this year. I am now going to dive in
and offer some feedback, both to Ian's comments as well as to others that
have replied. I also apologize that this will be an exceedingly long mess
Harald,
Point taken. Having spent a lot of time with the different versions of
the Postel Mail specifications, I got my citation incorrect.
The appendices to RFC 821, however, well prove my point. As noted
directly in Section 1, Introduction:
"SMTP is independent of the particular transmission
Þann mán 30.maí 2011 03:42, skrifaði Felix Halim:
Hmm.. yes, I think "unlimited" is a bad word (I just use it because
currently App Cache quota is unlimited).
Let me explain my need for pageStorage in a different way:
Suppose I have a web page and want to store it in an App Cache. This
web page
10 matches
Mail list logo