Re: [whatwg] IBM864 mapping of Encoding Standard

2012-04-26 Thread Makoto Kato
(2012/04/24 15:48), Henri Sivonen wrote: Does the OS/2 port need it for interfacing with the system APIs? If the OS/2 port needs it for interfacing with the system APIs, can we stop exposing the encoding to the Web and can we stop building the IBM864 encoder/decoder on non-OS/2 platforms? I

Re: [whatwg] Footer inside header

2012-04-26 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
On Apr 25, 2012 9:20 PM, Andrés Sanhueza peroyomasli...@gmail.com wrote: I see no reason a footer as in textual metadata of a section can't be inside a header (lead of a section). Could this be considered to be allowed? Do you have a real example where you think that markup would be useful?

Re: [whatwg] URL query component

2012-04-26 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:19:10 +0200, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de wrote: I think this is a case where you want to fail early (for some value of fail); so maybe substituting with ? makes most sense. Do any servers *expect* the Webkit behavior? If they do so, why don't they just fix

[whatwg] [canvas] letter-spaceing

2012-04-26 Thread Tyler Larson
In this version of the canvas spec, http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work which as far as I know of is the new one being worked on, there are two mentions of letter-spacing but no way to set the letter-spacing. If you take a look at

[whatwg] [canvas] inner shadows

2012-04-26 Thread Tyler Larson
Shadows can be applied to the outside of anything. This is a great feature that is otherwise rather difficult to recreate but why not enable users to be able to have inner shadows? Things like beveling, embossing and many other stylistic things that are used in today designs rely on inner

Re: [whatwg] [canvas] inner shadows

2012-04-26 Thread David Geary
You can specify negative shadow offsets for shadows inside a shape. Is that not good enough? david On Thursday, April 26, 2012, Tyler Larson wrote: Shadows can be applied to the outside of anything. This is a great feature that is otherwise rather difficult to recreate but why not enable

[whatwg] [media] played member expected behavior.

2012-04-26 Thread Paul Adenot
The played member [1] description of the media element states : The played attribute must return a new static normalized TimeRanges object that represents the ranges of the media resource, if any, that the user agent has so far rendered, at the time the attribute is evaluated. Currently

Re: [whatwg] [media] played member expected behavior.

2012-04-26 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, Paul Adenot wrote: The played member [1] description of the media element states : The played attribute must return a new static normalized TimeRanges object that represents the ranges of the media resource, if any, that the user agent has so far rendered, at the

[whatwg] Audio related feedback from years past

2012-04-26 Thread Ian Hickson
I respond below to a number of e-mails regarding audio features in HTML. The broad picture is that for effects, I recommend we defer to the work being done at the W3C in the public-audio mailing list. On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Chris McCormick wrote: On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:24:42AM -0700, Charles

Re: [whatwg] Footer inside header

2012-04-26 Thread Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
On Apr 26, 2012 5:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: according to the definition of footer, it appears that authorship information is most appropriate to put there. But sometimes the byline is placed inside the header area, which is reasonably marked up with a header. Isn't

Re: [whatwg] Footer inside header

2012-04-26 Thread Andrés Sanhueza
2012/4/26 Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis bhawkesle...@googlemail.com: On Apr 26, 2012 5:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: according to the definition of footer, it appears that authorship information is most appropriate to put there.  But sometimes the byline is placed inside the

Re: [whatwg] Endianness of typed arrays

2012-04-26 Thread David Herman
Sorry for joining the conversation late. On Mar 28, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Kenneth Russell wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Benoit Jacob bja...@mozilla.com wrote: 1. In webgl.bufferData implementation, don't call glBufferData, instead just cache the buffer data. 2. In