Hi Ian,
Like the succinct and simple name of complementary content (aside),
could we make the element name of the main content as succinct as aside?
For instance, main?
I have responded on the HTML WG list to a similar naming preference
comment:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
I'm developing a CMS and would like to be able to submit user-edited
content back to the server, but at present, it's not possible to do this
without copying the contents of the edited element with JavaScript into,
say, a hidden form field. I think
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
It should never be possible to make a contenteditable element contain
nothing, once it has something in it, because then it would collapse to
zero height and you wouldn't be able to click on it. [...]
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Ojan Vafai wrote:
While
Hi all,
I'd like a little information on the motivation for using absolute URLs on
input type=url validation.
Currently input type=url is to be validated using absolute URLs. Thus,
'http://www.mysite.com' validates but 'www.mysite.com' does not. I consider
this to be a huge usability issue.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Mikey Clarke wrote:
I'd like a little information on the motivation for using absolute URLs
on input type=url validation.
Currently input type=url is to be validated using absolute URLs.
Thus, 'http://www.mysite.com' validates but 'www.mysite.com' does not. I
I don't know if this matters or not, but at some point in time, other standards
than HTML like svg or audio might receive sensible proposals to allow other
media (than just text) to be contentEditable.
Just as it makes sense to have built in text editors (imagine the spectrum
ranging from
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, David Dailey wrote:
I don't know if this matters or not, but at some point in time, other
standards than HTML like svg or audio might receive sensible
proposals to allow other media (than just text) to be contentEditable.
Just as it makes sense to have built in text
No I had nothing at all in mind that might be inconsistent with what is
being discussed -- just sort of a free association I suppose.
Cheers
David
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:27 PM
To: David Dailey
Cc: 'whatwg';
This is good point. Could I just clarify my understanding with an example:
Given a thumbnail image with srcset:
srcset=low.jpg 20w, hi.jpg 40w, huge.jpg 80w
The webpage may want to have the browser scale the 20w image to say 50px
without the browser deciding that the 40w image is more
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Ian,
Like the succinct and simple name of complementary content (aside),
could we make the element name of the main content as succinct as aside?
For instance, main?
I have responded on the HTML WG list to a
10 matches
Mail list logo