Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Specify SHA512 hash of JavaScript files in

2014-02-04 Thread Yoav Weiss
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Some Developer wrote: > >Currently most people store their JavaScript code on a CDN of some sort. > >This often involves uploading their JavaScript files to a server hosted > and > >run by a third party which means the control and secur

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Specify SHA512 hash of JavaScript files in

2014-02-04 Thread Igor Minar
I like this a lot! I've been in discussions in the past where developers expressed concerns about inability to verify that the bits delivered from CDN were the same bits as the ones they reviewed and tested against during development. It's very common to pull popular libraries (like jquery, angul

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Specify SHA512 hash of JavaScript files in

2014-02-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Some Developer wrote: > > Currently most people store their JavaScript code on a CDN of some sort. > This often involves uploading their JavaScript files to a server hosted > and run by a third party which means the control and security of the > server is out of the hands of

Re: [whatwg] Document.title for SVG documents

2014-02-04 Thread Dirk Schulze
On Feb 3, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > Jonas Sicking wrote: >> An even simpler solution would be to say "we choose the first >> or in document order". That has the nice >> property that we align SVG and HTML more. > > Although as Dirk pointed out, SVG distinguishes elements

Re: [whatwg] hit regions: moving an element out of the shadow tree

2014-02-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > > > > The spec is currently silent what should happen when an element that > > > is associated with a hit region, is moved to another location in the > >

Re: [whatwg] hit regions: moving an element out of the shadow tree

2014-02-04 Thread Rik Cabanier
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > > > The spec is currently silent what should happen when an element that is > > associated with a hit region, is moved to another location in the > > document, another document or deleted. > > > > Thi

Re: [whatwg] Document.title for SVG documents

2014-02-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > Given that this does not define a html:title in html:head it's > non-conforming anyway so that seems fine. (I'm assuming we're using HTML > parsing rules of today.) The spec actually allows to be ommitted in a number of cases, e.g. srcdoc docum

Re: [whatwg] hit regions: moving an element out of the shadow tree

2014-02-04 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > The spec is currently silent what should happen when an element that is > associated with a hit region, is moved to another location in the > document, another document or deleted. > > This should result in removal of the hit region. Maybe this is defi

Re: [whatwg] Document.title for SVG documents

2014-02-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Cameron McCormack wrote: > OK, how about: if the document element is an , we choose the > first in document order; if the document element is an > , we choose the first child of the document element; > otherwise, null. This seems good. > This still is going to