Okay, I talked with some disabled web developers and Accessibility experts
today and talked about the proposal of markup in alt-text.
This seems not to be a good idea as screenreader would read the tags which
would confuse many users then.
So we would get into trouble with that approach according
Am 08.02.2012 um 10:43 schrieb Bronislav Klučka:
> On 8.2.2012 10:18, David Goss wrote:
>> On 8 February 2012 07:42, Anselm Hannemann wrote:
>>> I'd love to have *ability* (just for future use-cases which might come up
>>> and I already would have some for tablet-devices and smartphones) to add
Ashley,
so you think about the element attributes like I proposed?
(View as gist: https://gist.github.com/1158855)
Or did I misunderstood you?
-Anselm
Am 07.02.2012 um 10:45 schrieb Ashley Sheridan:
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 23:15 +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:23
Irakli,
I think it is not about markup vs server-side-solution. Server-side is not a
solution at all I think.
But it's about wether it's markup based (which means we also could serve
different content in images on different resolutions which would be a feature!)
or file-based as responsive (p
>> the original image (cropped shot not showing all the detail, etc).
> Yes already happening with background images with not text alt at all. So
> let's say it is progress.
>
> Le 6 sept. 2011 à 09:07, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur a écrit :
>> by the way,
Am 06.09.2011 um 08:36 schrieb Ashley Sheridan:
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 07:15 +0200, Karl Dubost wrote:
>>
>> Le 5 sept. 2011 à 15:07, Anselm Hannemann - Novolo Designagentur a écrit :
>> > Why should we use inline-styles once again? Why should we load content
>>
Am 01.09.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Charles Pritchard:
> On 8/31/2011 2:32 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
> Oh, that's not my proposal, that syntax was brought up by Tab Atkins.
>
> It's already available. I was looking into how to handle style="background: url(..)" />
> It may work with the following, now,
Am 31.08.2011 um 23:32 schrieb Karl Dubost:
> Anselm,
> (setting reply-to on www-style)
>
> Seen this today, to remind people that it is not just
> something up in the air. People need it.
> http://www.webmonkey.com/2011/08/speed-up-your-responsive-designs-with-adaptive-images/
>
> I wonder if
Hi all,
Paul Irish said I should mention my problems here. So I will:
As we now have the possibility of creating fluid and responsive layouts in
several ways we have a problem with images.
There's currently no good feature to implement something like responsive images
which adapt to the differe
