Re: [whatwg] HTML5 Video - Issue and Request for improvment

2011-01-29 Thread Monty Montgomery
If I want to toggle play/pause on video area click, then I cannot do this, because clicking on the play control button, fires play, then click event fires for video tag and when I toggle It pauses. So this behavior that every popular flash player has cannot be achieved. There is no way to

Re: [whatwg] Live video streaming with html5.

2010-09-22 Thread Monty Montgomery
I run a HTML5 streaming business. I use icecast to send Ogg with Theora+Vorbis. It works splendidly in Opera and Firefox. Chromium has some problems because they use ffmpeg which is not always that good when decoding Theora, but if I use the old, bad versions of Theora, it also works in

Re: [whatwg] Html 5 video element's poster attribute

2010-09-20 Thread Monty Montgomery
They are not designed to be independent. If you want them to be independent, use a real independent image placed over the video. Is there a way to do this without also obscuring the controls [making them inacessible]? Monty

Re: [whatwg] Html 5 video element's poster attribute

2010-09-19 Thread Monty Montgomery
Ah, interesting, I just wasted most of last night trying to figure out why I couldn't get poster to do anything sane or useful in Chrome or Firefox (actually-- FF4 betas change behavior completely and the poster.. sort of... behaves as expected). Currently the poster disappears as soon as the

Re: [whatwg] Html 5 video element's poster attribute

2010-09-19 Thread Monty Montgomery
Actually, the browser behavior is all more complicated than this the preload attribute is influencing it strongly eg, FF4 doesn't show the poster if 'preload' is not set to 'none' And I was wrong now that I recheck chrome... it too replaces poster with first frame, but the poster

Re: [whatwg] Html 5 video element's poster attribute

2010-09-19 Thread Monty Montgomery
[apologies, FF4 is working properly... tracked it down to setting 'video.currentTime=0' kicks off dropping the poster and actively preloading] ...but not losing sight of the original post, I agree with the suggestions, and am happy to find FF4 is already following them. Monty

Re: [whatwg] On implementing videos with multiple tracks in HTML5

2010-05-31 Thread Monty Montgomery
2010/5/31 Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au: WebM, just like Matroska, certainly does support multiple video and audio tracks.  The current limitation is that browser implementations don't yet provide an interface or API for track selection. It could, but the spec currently explicitly

Re: [whatwg] On implementing videos with multiple tracks in HTML5

2010-05-31 Thread Monty Montgomery
2010/5/31 Monty Montgomery xiphm...@gmail.com: 2010/5/31 Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au: WebM, just like Matroska, certainly does support multiple video and audio tracks.  The current limitation is that browser implementations don't yet provide an interface or API for track selection