> If I want to toggle play/pause
> on video area click, then I cannot do this, because clicking on the play
> control button, fires play, then click event fires for video tag and when I
> toggle It pauses. So this behavior that every popular flash player has
> cannot be achieved. There is no way to
> I run a HTML5 streaming business. I use icecast to send Ogg with
> Theora+Vorbis. It works splendidly in Opera and Firefox. Chromium has
> some problems because they use ffmpeg which is not always that good
> when decoding Theora, but if I use the old, bad versions of Theora, it
> also works in C
> They are not designed to be independent. If you want them to be independent,
> use a real independent image placed over the video.
Is there a way to do this without also obscuring the controls [making
them inacessible]?
Monty
[apologies, FF4 is working properly... tracked it down to setting
'video.currentTime=0' kicks off dropping the poster and actively
preloading]
...but not losing sight of the original post, I agree with the
suggestions, and am happy to find FF4 is already following them.
Monty
Actually, the browser behavior is all more complicated than this
the preload attribute is influencing it strongly eg, FF4 doesn't
show the poster if 'preload' is not set to 'none' And I was wrong
now that I recheck chrome... it too replaces poster with first frame,
but the poster shows
Ah, interesting, I just wasted most of last night trying to figure out
why I couldn't get poster to do anything sane or useful in Chrome or
Firefox (actually-- FF4 betas change behavior completely and the
poster.. sort of... behaves as expected).
>> Currently the poster disappears as soon as the f
2010/5/31 Monty Montgomery :
> 2010/5/31 Lachlan Hunt :
>
>> WebM, just like Matroska, certainly does support multiple video and audio
>> tracks. The current limitation is that browser implementations don't yet
>> provide an interface or API for track selectio
2010/5/31 Lachlan Hunt :
> WebM, just like Matroska, certainly does support multiple video and audio
> tracks. The current limitation is that browser implementations don't yet
> provide an interface or API for track selection.
It could, but the spec currently explicitly disallows it. Has that
c
> It's from speaking to people at companies who've been bitten by this.
> (It works something like "you will be ineligible for this substantial
> discount if you implement Vorbis.") No quotable citation, sorry.
It's the loophole that makes RAND potentially meaningless. Everyone
supposedly pays a
On Dec 13, 2007 6:18 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It matters in this case because the press release cites large company
> (i.e. potential patent troll magnet) deployment of Vorbis, but then
> the press release mostly talks about video.
Oh, I misunderstood what you meant in t
On Dec 13, 2007 5:32 AM, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's unfortunate that this press release conflates Ogg, Vorbis and
> Theora.
Although it is a point of nerd pride to correct 'Ogg is just the
container, the codecs are', that truth depends on context. Ogg is
and always w
prietary methods, we support the W3C's desire
to adopt the unencumbered technology as the baseline.
Christopher "Monty" Montgomery [and others]
Director
Xiph.Org
[1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_types
[2]
http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&rh=n%3A172630%2Cp_4%
12 matches
Mail list logo
