Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-08 Thread Yuzo Fujishima
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ? (e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); ) It seems space is optional after colon in field of

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-08 Thread Julian Reschke
Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (�~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote: protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ? (e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); ) It seems space is optional after colon in field of handshake message, how can we distinguish U+0020

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-08 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Yuzo Fujishima wrote: On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: protocol now accepts U+0020. Is it ok to use U+0020 only in /protocol/ ? (e.g. new WebSocket(ws://example.com/, ); ) It

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A LINE FEED (LF) or U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) characters in it. But The Web Socket protocol 3.1 Parsing Web Socket URLs, says

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A LINE FEED (LF) or U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) characters in it.

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Julian Reschke
Ian Hickson wrote: ... Control characters are allowed (though using them would be silly). Why are control characters (except LF and CR) allowed? There doesn't seem to be a good reason to exclude them, and excluding them would lead to a more complicated processing model. ... There isn't a

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (�µ~\飼æ~V~Gæ~U~O) wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it