On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:34:05 +0100, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
In the absence
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:34:05 +0100, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20
On 12/2/2010 2:48 AM, whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:46 -0500
From: Boris Zbarskybzbar...@mit.edu
To:whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] CSS canvas() function
Message-ID:4cf70b66.7060...@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 12/2/10 1:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
img does, though, if the resource for whatever reason hasn't been
received and successfully decoded yet.
I think showing @alt in this context for img would be _really_ weird...
-Boris
On 12/2/10 1:27 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Is this one in specs somewhere?
No, though there is ongoing work to create a way to have iframes outside
the DOM that load documents.
-Boris
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 12/2/10 1:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
img does, though, if the resource for whatever reason hasn't been
received and successfully decoded yet.
I think showing @alt in this context for img would be _really_ weird...
On 12/2/2010 12:08 PM, whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org wrote:
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 13:39:35 -0500
From: Boris Zbarskybzbar...@mit.edu
To:whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: Re: [whatwg] CSS canvas() function
Message-ID:4cf7e7e7.3080...@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Simon Fraser s...@me.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
In the absence of
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
I think we could spec the following cases:
1) img containing a fully loaded image; size is the intrinsic size of the
image
2) video when it's displaying a video or fully loaded poster image; size
is the intrinsic
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
For example, I've recently been playing with fractals in canvas, and
temporarily set my blog to have a screen-filling canvas z-index'd
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors (limited to only ID
selectors, but other valid selectors are accepted, they just don't
currently do anything). Then element-ref() takes an ident, which the
js function maps
On 12/02/2010 12:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors (limited to only ID
selectors, but other valid selectors are accepted, they just don't
currently do anything). Then
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Olli Pettay olli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 12/02/2010 12:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors (limited to only ID
selectors, but other valid
On 12/02/2010 01:43 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Olli Pettayolli.pet...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On 12/02/2010 12:42 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've gone with using element() for selectors
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
My question was specifically for an out-of-document iframe.
In-document, all elements are obviously valid.
Something like:
script
var frame = document.createElement(iframe);
frame.src = http://www.example.com;
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at img, canvas
and video and whitelist in more elements later if necessary.
input type=image? object/embed seem to have roughly equivalent
use-cases to video
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at img,
canvas
and video and whitelist in more elements later if necessary.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at
On 12/1/10 6:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
My question was specifically for an out-of-documentiframe.
Most browsers don't load documents in such iframes at all, right?
Should this work? The rendering of a non-seamlessiframe doesn't
depend on any other elements in the document. In general,
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org
wrote:
In the absence of compelling use cases, I'd just leave it at img, canvas
and video
On 12/2/10 12:34 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
It's a shame to disallow HTML elements with known width and height, e.g.
if you want to render a small disconnected div subtree into a canvas
or map it onto a WebGL texture. You'd have to decide how to resolve
style (maybe assume it's a child of the
(This is being sent to the WHATWG list, rather than the CSSWG list, as
it seems like the sort of thing that should be primarily defined in
HTML, with a CSS spec just referring to the HTML definition, like
:active and similar things.)
Webkit has for some time now supported using the
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Webkit has for some time now supported using the -webkit-canvas()
function in CSS anywhere you could use an image
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
For example, I've recently been playing with fractals in canvas, and
temporarily set my blog to have a screen-filling canvas z-index'd
below the content, filled with an interactive fractal (the mandelbrot
set, overlaid
24 matches
Mail list logo
