On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote:
> > >
> > > The spec is not very clear anywhere about styling practices (I know
> > > this is CSS' job, but within HTML the mark-up should at least be
> > > mentioned).
> >
> > Could you elaborate on what you had in mind? Note that default styles
>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > A long story regarding the companies' origins and goals...
>> >
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>> > > src="example1_thmb.jpg />
>> > > src="example2_thmb.jpg />
>> > > src="exampl
> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
> >
> >
> >
> > A long story regarding the companies' origins and goals...
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> >src="example1_thmb.jpg />
> >src="example2_thmb.jpg />
> >src="example3_thmb.jpg />
> >src="example4_thmb.jpg />
> >
> I don't thin
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>>
>> Definitely not; it's part of the application. From your snippet, the
>> page seems to be built as a picture-app, which means both the image
>> and the thumbnails work together; neither is tangential to the pu
> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>
> Definitely not; it's part of the application. From your snippet, the
> page seems to be built as a picture-app, which means both the image
> and the thumbnails work together; neither is tangential to the purpose
> of the page like a sidebar would be.
I think this is
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Yuvalik Webdesign
wrote:
>> From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
>>
>> Please file specific bugs or send specific e-mails for each example you
>> think should be reworked; there are over 300 examples in the spec and
>> without knowing what is wrong with each o
> From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
>
> Please file specific bugs or send specific e-mails for each example you
> think should be reworked; there are over 300 examples in the spec and
> without knowing what is wrong with each one, if I just go through them
> all
> and change them, they're j
> From: Ian Hickson
>
> > C) When talking about outline (in the context of sectioning) I gather
> we
> > are NOT talking about the DOM-tree, but about (a Table Of) Contents
> kind
> > of outline.
>
> Right.
>
>
> > Does a generic page-header and footer (containing a site-wide logo,
> > style a
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Yuvalik Webdesign wrote:
>
> A) In the NAV element it says: "In particular, it is common for footers
> to have a list of links to various key parts of a site, but the footer
> element is more appropriate in such cases, and no nav element is
> necessary for those links."
>
>
Evert wrote:
I am still having problems accepting the differences between
and though. I understand when to use one over
the other, but what was the background for choosing two elements
instead of one? What is the drawback of defining just one in the
spec (either or ) and giving that one
> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>
> I meant it when I said you were overthinking things. ^_^ Don't try
> too hard; the categories are general and pretty simple.
Very well, perhaps I am overcomplicating things a bit. I'll try to be a bit
less stringent in my mark-up (I guess I am trying to be too much
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
wrote:
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>> > Also, a side-bar, what is that, since side-bars are usually
>> separately layed-out and not always directly "around the content".
>>
>> You're interpreting "around" too strictly here. It means just
>> "nearby" h
> From: Tab Atkins Jr.
> > Also, a side-bar, what is that, since side-bars are usually
> separately layed-out and not always directly "around the content".
>
> You're interpreting "around" too strictly here. It means just
> "nearby" here. It means exactly what it says - can be used
> for mark
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Yuvalik Webdesign
wrote:
> B)
> It also says for ASIDE that:
> "The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of content
> that is tangentially related to the content around the aside element, and
> which could be considered separate from that co
First off, I apologise if this message appears twice in the list. After
registration, something went wrong on my end and it seems my message was not
picked up by the list. If it does appear twice, again my apologies. Disregard
the other one.
In regard to my remarks, I would also like to point o
15 matches
Mail list logo
