On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> Dec 16, 2008, в 9:43 AM, Ian Hickson написал(а):
>
> > > 1) The algorithm assumes that a WorkerGlobalScope exists, and
> > > doesn't specify what happens if it is invoked before
> > > WorkerGlobalScope is created (e.g. if the script is still b
Dec 16, 2008, в 9:43 AM, Ian Hickson написал(а):
1) The algorithm assumes that a WorkerGlobalScope exists, and doesn't
specify what happens if it is invoked before WorkerGlobalScope is
created (e.g. if the script is still being loaded, or the scope is
being
created, but Worker.terminate() is
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> 1) The algorithm assumes that a WorkerGlobalScope exists, and doesn't
> specify what happens if it is invoked before WorkerGlobalScope is
> created (e.g. if the script is still being loaded, or the scope is being
> created, but Worker.terminate
1) The algorithm assumes that a WorkerGlobalScope exists, and doesn't
specify what happens if it is invoked before WorkerGlobalScope is
created (e.g. if the script is still being loaded, or the scope is
being created, but Worker.terminate() is called from JS). I think that
the right behavio
