On 4 Nov 2007, at 12:40, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:27:50 +0100, Krzysztof ??elechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dnia 03-11-2007, sob o godzinie 08:42 +, Ian Hickson napisa??(a):
Ok, I've added a rel value similar to nofollow called
noreferer that
does this.
While we are unable correct the spelling of referer, we certainly
need not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be some end to
this self-humiliation.
I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the
feature affects the Referer (sic) header.
I too think Anne is right
While we are unable correct the spelling of referer, we
certainly need not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be
some end to this self-humiliation.
I think it's way better to stay consistent. Especially as the
feature affects the Referer (sic) header.
I too think Anne is right
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote:
Ok, I've added a rel value similar to nofollow called noreferer
that does this.
While we are unable correct the spelling of referer, we certainly need
not duplicate it for noreferrer. There must be some end to this
self-humiliation.
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:27:50 +0100, Krzysztof Żelechowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia 03-11-2007, sob o godzinie 08:42 +, Ian Hickson napisał(a):
Ok, I've added a rel value similar to nofollow called noreferer that
does this.
While we are unable correct the spelling of referer, we
