Robert O'Callahan wrote:
I think we should go the route that the dialog element did in Ted's
change proposal and have a pseudo-element that gets created when an
element is fullscreened. Simple and easy, and trivial for the author
to manipulate to get most effects they could want.
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:10:09 +0100, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I think we should go the route that the dialog element did in Ted's
change proposal and have a pseudo-element that gets created
Hm, why would it require stacking-level changes? One obvious way to
get it to act correctly is to make it wrap around the element, like
the old ::outside pseudo-element proposal. Then it's trivial.
The CP says The dialog and its cover, taken together, are siblings within a
new stacking
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
It seems like we shouldn't assume that these are the only two features
that will ever need this sort of rendering support. I'll get a www-style
thread going.
Thanks. If multiple specs (or even multiple running
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Having the rest of the page visible under the fullscreen element is not
expected and I think we should default to avoiding it. background:black
seemed like the right thing for video and a reasonable default for other
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote:
Having the rest of the page visible under the fullscreen element is not
expected and I think we should default to avoiding it.
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:25:38 +0100, Robert O'Callahan
rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
I have removed background:black as the way the rendering is defined at
the moment is that it cannot be overridden unless !important is
On 11/15/11 11:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
UA does not have an important level.
In Gecko it actually does: it's a level that overrides the user
important level. Such a level is sort of needed in some cases, no
matter what you actually choose to call it.
-Boris
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I think we should go the route that the dialog element did in Ted's
change proposal and have a pseudo-element that gets created when an
element is fullscreened. Simple and easy, and trivial for the author
to
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think we should go the route that the dialog element did in Ted's
change proposal and have a pseudo-element that gets created when an
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hm, why would it require stacking-level changes? One obvious way to
get it to act correctly is to make it wrap around the element, like
the old ::outside pseudo-element proposal. Then it's trivial.
The CP says The
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hm, why would it require stacking-level changes? One obvious way to
get it to act correctly is to make it wrap around the element, like
12 matches
Mail list logo
