On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Mark Finkle wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mark Finkle wrote:
> > >
> > > The only reason I can see for such an API is to get the user's
> > > permission to use features that _may_ be a bit of a security risk to
> > > no
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mark Finkle wrote:
> >
> > The only reason I can see for such an API is to get the user's
> > permission to use features that _may_ be a bit of a security risk to
> > normal webapps. Clipboard, dock badging, local file drag-
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> I think there are two competing ideas here that are sometimes in
> tension:
>
> A) Web applications are just Web pages and should be indistinguishable
> from any other Web page.
>
> B) Web applications are just applications and should be
> indis
Based on discussions around this topic I've drafted a very experimental
section introducing a element.
The element is expected to be styled much like an element by
user agents:
bb:enabled { color: blue; text-decoration: underline; }
bb:disabled { display: none; }
bb[type=makeapp]:e
@lists.whatwg.org; Ian Hickson; Brady Eidson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposed additions to ClientInformation interface
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tuesday 08 of July 2008 05:10:46 Mark Finkle napisał(a):
> On M
I'll reply to this in more detail in due course, but I'm still interested
in the idea, and would like to discuss that further:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >
> > One possibility for addressing these requirements would be an element
> > that acts as a link, button, or icon, o
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Krzysztof Żelechowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Tuesday 08 of July 2008 05:10:46 Mark Finkle napisał(a):
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Brady Eidson wrote:
> > > * Sites want to offer a way f
Tuesday 08 of July 2008 05:10:46 Mark Finkle napisał(a):
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Brady Eidson wrote:
> > * Sites want to offer a way for users to opt into a standalone mode
> > ("can we offer a link to download one of thes
Tuesday 08 of July 2008 14:45:23 Maciej Stachowiak napisał(a):
> The way I think of standalone(*) Web applications is that they should
> work well in the browser context, but be able to provide progressive
> enhancement when in standalone mode. For example, native applications
> have custom i
On Jul 7, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
Actually there are a number of features that cater for this use case
already, like the sizes="" attribute on rel=icon, and one of the
names. In general, though, the idea is to make these kinds of
applications
as indistinguishable from other Web
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Brady Eidson wrote:
> >
> > There is one aspect to this notion of "Web Applications" that is being
> > explored by multiple vendors but hasn't been explicitly addressed in
> > HTML5 quite yet: the "stand
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Brady Eidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second: "void makeStandalone();"
I think one disadvantage of this approach is that it can only be
called in response to a user action if you want to avoid it being used
to annoy or spam. It's unfortunate to have an API tha
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Indeed. (This isn't unique to this proposal; the original idea of an API
> would be even more vulnerable to this, since scripts could just invoke it
> at any time they please.)
>
Of course, but that can be seen as an advant
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One possibility for addressing these requirements would be an element
> > that acts as a link, button, or icon, or some such, and which invokes
> > user agent features. S
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One possibility for addressing these requirements would be an element that
> acts as a link, button, or icon, or some such, and which invokes user
> agent features. Something like:
>
>
>
It's an interesting idea. You'd h
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Brady Eidson wrote:
>
> There is one aspect to this notion of "Web Applications" that is being
> explored by multiple vendors but hasn't been explicitly addressed in
> HTML5 quite yet: the "stand alone web application."
Actually there are a number of features that cater for
16 matches
Mail list logo
