On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Marques Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
>> at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
>>
>> The idea of the spec is to enable address
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
> at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
>
> The idea of the spec is to enable addressing sub-parts of audio-visual
> resources through URIs, such as http://
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
> > All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
> > type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
> > would need to support a video mime type in an element. I don't
> > s
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:23 AM, timeless wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> Note that I do understand the need and am trying to explain how it can
>> be made to work. Also I am trying to show that what might look as the
>> simplest approach won't work and why.
>
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
>> type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
>> would need to support a video mime type
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Note that I do understand the need and am trying to explain how it can
> be made to work. Also I am trying to show that what might look as the
> simplest approach won't work and why.
It doesn't have to be made to work that way, which is the
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
> type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
> would need to support a video mime type in an element. I don't
> see that as the intention of the
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:43 PM, timeless wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
> wrote:
>> It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
>> element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
>> "file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15" is an Ogg Theora segment out of a
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
wrote:
> It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
> element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
> "file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15" is an Ogg Theora segment out of a video, then
> that is what the element receives.
right
Hi Jonas,
You may also be interested to check out the presentation at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/talks/2010-06-30-Jakub_Sendor-Media_Fragment_Firefox_Plugin.pdf
which has a screenshot in it of the Firefox plugin.
Will do the screencast this week.
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:07 PM, timeless wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>> This latter one is already defined as a 5 sec video extract from the
>> full file.ogv - it's not possible to overload that with turning the
>> byte range into an animated gif.
>
> So, i
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> This latter one is already defined as a 5 sec video extract from the
> full file.ogv - it's not possible to overload that with turning the
> byte range into an animated gif.
So, isn't restricted to animated GIFs, Mozilla supports animated
The idea or returning a single image for a URI that points at a video
has indeed been discussed. It is not possible to do with a URI
fragment, since a URI fragment (#) can only return the same mime type
as the main URI. But the suggestion for this is to use a URI query.
Then, it is possible to retu
A point in time, if it relates to an I-frame, is very small set and it
represents an image.
It would be interesting to have
or animated images in the sense of:
I think the earlier post was looking to display video thumbnails using
this sort of fragment notation.
If the video wasn't being play
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Actually, a point in time is nothing - it's an empty set. You never
> want to actually point to a point in time, but rather to either the
> point in time and an interval after that point in time, or everything
> from that point onwards. That
Actually, a point in time is nothing - it's an empty set. You never
want to actually point to a point in time, but rather to either the
point in time and an interval after that point in time, or everything
from that point onwards. That's what these URIs represent.
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2
That would be great. I guess it's unclear to me how the UIs would differ for
video.ogv#t=40,50
and
video.ogv#t=40
In particular it seems strange to me that video.ogv#t=40 represents
the whole range from the selected point to the end of the video, given
that most commonly when wanting to point out
BTW: I will try and make a screencast of that firefox plugin, which
should clarify things further. Stay tuned...
Cheers,
Silvia.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi Silvia,
>>
>> Back in may last year
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Hi Silvia,
>
> Back in may last year I brought [1] up the fact that there are two use
> cases for temporal media fragments:
>
> 1. Skipping to a particular point in a longer resource, such as
> wanting to start a video at a particul
Hi Silvia,
Back in may last year I brought [1] up the fact that there are two use
cases for temporal media fragments:
1. Skipping to a particular point in a longer resource, such as
wanting to start a video at a particular point while still allowing
seeking in the entire resource. This is current
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:11:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
>> at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
>>
>> The idea of the spec is to enable addr
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:11:44 +0200, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
Hi all,
The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft
at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ .
The idea of the spec is to enable addressing sub-parts of audio-visual
resources through URIs, such as http://exam
22 matches
Mail list logo
