Ian Hickson wrote:
Client-side with (doesn't work in WinIE6, works in Moz, Opera):
(or )
...
I've never seen that used at all either, most likely because it doesn't
work in IE and because every single tutorial I've ever seen only teaches
area.
While it is definitely a bette
Ian Hickson wrote:
should probably be allowed too, though it doesn't seem to be
included in web apps. Oh well, that's probably a discussion for another
thread anyway, if it hasn't already been discussed (I'll search the
archives later).
We haven't discussed it yet. I hadn't really thought abou
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, fantasai wrote:
> >
> > Anyone want us to keep ?
>
> If Moz and Opera support it, then it already passes CR criteria.
Yeah, but so what? It's not used, it's redundant with another (more widely
implemented, not must worse) feature, and it makes the spec more
complicated. Wou
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, fantasai wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > ...
> >
> > ...and given that the former would work in all existing UAs and the
> > second wouldn't, and the former has the same semantics as the second,
> > I don't see much of an advantage to the second.
>
> It's similar to the d
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > Anyone want us to keep ?
>
> The reason I especially liked it was:
>
>
>
>
> ...
> ...
Yup, it is indeed nice; if image maps had been designed that way from the
start it would make sense. But it's not _that_
Ian Hickson wrote:
Client-side with (doesn't work in WinIE6, works in Moz, Opera):
(or )
...
I couldn't find any uses of . (Data based
on a sample of over 600,000 randomly chosen sites.)
I'd guess that's because of the WinIE6 holdup. Hardly anyone designs
a site that won't wo
Ian Hickson wrote:
I agree that it doesn't seem to make much sense to nest paragraphs inside
those tables though.
Agreed.
...
...
...and given that the former would work in all existing UAs and the second
wouldn't, and the former has the same semantics as the second, I don't see
much o
FYI, the W3C has just acknowledged receipt of the Web Forms 2.0 draft that
Mozilla and Opera submitted (on behalf of the WHATWG).
Web Forms 2 draft
http://www.w3.org/Submission/web-forms2/
W3C Team Comment
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2005/02/Comment
We'll be publishing another cal
Ian Hickson wrote:
Anyone want us to keep ?
The reason I especially liked it was:
...
...
... but I never really used it for something as it wasn't supported by IE...
By the way, will it be deprecated, not mentioned or forbidden? Will
Mozilla and Opera drop support for it?
--
An
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> What is the use case for [allowing] tables to be nested inside ?
For instance:
When you look at
x | 1 | 2 |
---+---+---+
1 | 1 | 2 |
---+---+---+
2 | 2 | 4 |
---+---+---+
...it is clear that [bla bla bla].
I a
There are fours ways of doing image maps in HTML4:
Server-side with form submit:
Server-side with hyperlink:
Client-side with :
(or )
...
Client-side with (doesn't work in WinIE6, works in Moz, Opera):
(or )
...
It seems type="ima
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Olav Junker Kjær wrote:
>
> "Submission buttons only submit the first form they are associated with.
> Reset buttons must submit all the forms they are associated with."
>
> You probably meant "Reset buttons must *reset* all the forms they are
> associated with." :-)
Oops,
Ian Hickson wrote:
I have tweaked the spec to hopefully fix this. Please let me know if it is
still broken. :-)
"Submission buttons only submit the first form they are associated with.
Reset buttons must submit all the forms they are associated with."
You probably meant "Reset buttons must *rese
13 matches
Mail list logo
