Hi,
i tried to convert my current skeleton to wicket 2.0, but stumbled into a
problem i cant solve so far:
My base:
I have a LinkPanel that creates a List containing Navigationallinks in a
MasterPage (here BasePage extending WebPage) and uses a
getNavList(PageParameters paramsIn) function to
Hi,
I ask myself a question. Why wicket needs to rewrite js libraries for
ajax or other client-side scripts or to include external scripts (date
picker for exemple). There are a lot of frameworks which work fine and
do everything needed in wicket such as Dojo, script.aculo.us, etc...Why
first of all i wouldnt pass components around in a list.
there are a couple of ways to do that
the easist would probably be to have something like this:
interface ILinkFactory { Link newLink(Component parent, String id); }
then instead of ListBookmarkablePageLink you pass in ListILinkFactory.
On 11/10/06, Vincent demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ask myself a question. Why wicket needs to rewrite js libraries for
ajax or other client-side scripts or to include external scripts (date
picker for exemple).
we are rewriting the datepicker because our old one was not compatible
Hello,
I ask myself a question. Why wicket needs to rewrite js libraries for
ajax or other client-side scripts or to include external scripts (date
picker for exemple). There are a lot of frameworks which work fine and
do everything needed in wicket such as Dojo, script.aculo.us, etc...Why
see my response to your previous post
-igor
On 11/10/06, Vincent Demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ask myself a question. Why wicket needs to rewrite js libraries for
ajax or other client-side scripts or to include external scripts (date
picker for exemple). There are a lot of
Hi Igor,
thanks for your reply. I understand that i should do it using an interface
and not expose the wicket:id's.
However, even if i pass it in there (navlist now as navListILink):
add(new ListView(navList, navList) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
Hello,
I have a need for an interface that is a twin to IHeaderContributor, but
which will contribute javascript to be executed after the html has been
rendered on the client. I realize all the hooks are there with
WebPage.getBodyContainer().addOnLoadModifier(), and
Vincent demay a écrit :
Ok I understand that and I don't what to say that wicket dojo
implementation is bad because it's very cool ;)
I would like to
say ajax implementation and not dojo implementation
Indeed using a framework as is could be
Just so you know,
There is a wicket-stuff project that integrates scriptaculous with Wicket.
There'll be quite a few additions to that project comming soon too!
On 11/10/06, Vincent demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ask myself a question. Why wicket needs to rewrite js libraries for
ajax
On 11/10/06, Vincent demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c) we have partial page updates of multiple components in a single
request -
do any of those frameworks have it? i briefly looked at ricko which had
a
similar ajax-envelope response that can encapsulate markup for multiple
parts of the
add(new ListView(navList, navList) {
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
ILinkFactory factory=item.getModelObject();
factory.newLink(item, id);
}
});
-igor
On 11/10/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Igor Vaynberg a écrit :
On 11/10/06, Vincent demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c) we have partial page updates of multiple components in a single
request -
do any of those frameworks have it? i briefly looked at ricko which
had
a
similar ajax-envelope response that can encapsulate markup
On 11/10/06, Vincent demay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
imagine dojo provides stuff to make a conrner case like this easier.
I used AjaxRequestTarget to construct the envelope
and here is the client-side code. It is not perfect but it work (ie
remove CDATA is not as clean as I wanted but I not
Hi everybody,
(this is the first time I post here, so I should probably present
myself.. my name's Filippo, live in Milan, for more info:
http://www.diotalevi.com; obviously I like Wicket and I'd like to
contribute, but give me some time to study it more in deep...).
This morning I was having a
We (Martijn and me) spoke there last year, but after doing a couple of
presentations the last year, we're out of time and energy (and money!)
to keep on doing that. We might get more active again in 2007.
But... everyone is more than welcome to take up the initiative, so if
any of you Wicket
16 matches
Mail list logo
