This is probably a question for the user group, but I thought I might post
it here first. In putting together an application based on Wicket I've
noticed the following:
1. Load a form full of Ajax links and features, and even an
AjaxSubmitButton / Link. But it's not easy to have the AjaxFormSu
not only is the name of this method horribly jacked up, but it doesnt appear
to be called from anywhere?
can we remove it?
-igor
On 4/27/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like for example RefreshingView using an IDataProvider...
say what now?
-igor
imho it can wait until the next version.
+0
-igor
On 4/27/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on that. And use EnumeratedType instead, so we can say
public AjaxEventBehavoir(ClientEvent event)
Frank
On 4/27/07, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007,
this will get better in the next version when we can break an api and pass
around a javascript object instead of strings.
-igor
On 4/27/07, Julian Klappenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following was gathered from a particular implementation using
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior
var wcall=wicketS
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
Take it as my favourite one to be fixed then, and don't mind the
serious tone, I'm always serious ;-)
Yes, needs fixing. Am looking into this right now.
However, we agreed not to release beta before all important
refactorings are merged, but on the other
maven central is up to speed though.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/slf4j/
Johan
Johan Compagner wrote:
why is maven not really up to date (as it seems)
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.slf4j/jars/
1.1.0beta0 is the latest of the API/Log4j impl?
but they are versions ahead currently as fa
quickest (load balancer) to setup in my experience is Resin
On 4/26/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on what's the best app-server/load-balancer
combination to use in general or for Wicket in particular?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nab
why is maven not really up to date (as it seems)
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/org.slf4j/jars/
1.1.0beta0 is the latest of the API/Log4j impl?
but they are versions ahead currently as far as a can see:
http://www.slf4j.org/download.html (1.3.1)
johan
On 4/26/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTE
+1 on that. And use EnumeratedType instead, so we can say
public AjaxEventBehavoir(ClientEvent event)
Frank
On 4/27/07, Timo Rantalaiho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Johan Compagner wrote:
> then you could maybe point us to a feature that was in 2.0 but is
overlooked
> by us
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Johan Compagner wrote:
> then you could maybe point us to a feature that was in 2.0 but is overlooked
> by use to backport
The ClientEvent enum
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket/trunk/wicket/src/java/wicket/ajax/ClientEvent.java?view=markup
was in 2.0 but does not
* Johan Compagner:
> and there will be another beta release after this and again
> after that.
>
> the only blocker bugs the current one can encouter are legal
> once or another none apache way of releasing ..
Take it as my favourite one to be fixed then, and don't mind the
serious ton
and there will be another beta release after this and again after that.
the only blocker bugs the current one can encouter are legal once or another
none apache way of releasing ..
ofcourse if wicket wouldn't run at all that would also be a case but that
isn't the case because all of our 500+ te
* Martijn Dashorst:
> On 4/27/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix
> > > it for the release?
> >
> > At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get
> > t
i think this is quite along time already the case.. you are free in it to
fix it ofcourse!
On 4/26/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Notice how the markup and the Java don't match below. Did someone forget
a
checkin?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1
On 4/27/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
> Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix it
> for the release?
At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get to be
part of the ongoing 1.3.0-incubating-beta
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Friday, April 27, 2007, 9:25:43 AM, you wrote:
> Could you please test if it works for you so that we can fix it
> for the release?
At this stage, I'd have thought that the only way it could get to be
part of the ongoing 1.3.0-incubating-beta1 (which is what I assume
you're
Cool, thanks.
Eelco
On 4/27/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a delete of all the build files seems to do the trick.
On 4/27/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I can't get bamboo to do a fresh build. It tries to update from svn,
> but then complains th
a delete of all the build files seems to do the trick.
On 4/27/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I can't get bamboo to do a fresh build. It tries to update from svn,
but then complains that the SVN repository is locked. It says it will
issue a cleanup request for the next
Hi there,
We have a bug in WicketFilter.getRelativePath(), where the URI is
being decoded whereas it should not, to preserve bookmarkable page
/ delimited parameters.
I reworked the code to cope with that and tested it successfully
with all combinations of the different cases (servlet, fil
The following was gathered from a particular implementation using
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior
var wcall=wicketSubmitFormById('userListForm6',
'?wicket:interface=:0:bodyPanel:panel:optionsBody:panel:userListForm:searchUsers:-1:IUnversionedBehaviorListener:0&wicket:ignoreIfNotActive=true',
null, functio
21 matches
Mail list logo
