* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Author: jcompagner
> Date: Tue May 1 02:37:59 2007
> New Revision: 533985
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=533985
> Log:
> we really can't just terminate break all our solutions!)
> i now only output the value string if it is a what about the name
> att
We picked a time and day: May 3rd, 8pm. Be there or be square
(obligatory '80s quote).
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework
On 5/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> protected Object convertValue(String[] value) {
> // we can ignore passed in value, but what we do instead is create an
> object based on child components
> LocalTime time=(LocalTime)timepicker.getconvertedinput();
> DateTime datetime
somebody made a copy of the ResourceStreamRequestTarget ...
On 4/30/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-scriptaculous/src/java/org/wicketstuff/scriptaculous/ScriptaculousRequestTarget.java?revision=202
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I just had a small idea, to regain the line precise error message when
we construct the component tree we lost in the constructor change
removal.
Why don't we record the stack trace in Component#Component() if we are
in development mode, and put it in the meta data or in
didn't jonathan work on that already?
that he did a diff with our xml parser??
johan
On 5/1/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was new to me, but may be you are already aware of it. I was using
> jdk 1.6 to run the tests on my windows pc and all tests passed. I
> recognized t
protected Object convertValue(String[] value) {
// we can ignore passed in value, but what we do instead is create an
object based on child components
LocalTime time=(LocalTime)timepicker.getconvertedinput();
DateTime datetime=time.withDate
((LocalDate)datepicker.getConvertedInput());
retu
It was new to me, but may be you are already aware of it. I was using
jdk 1.6 to run the tests on my windows pc and all tests passed. I
recognized that Bamboo failed (and eelco fixed it) but I couldn't
quite figure out why. Now I know. I changed jdk back to 1.4 and now it
works with eelco's chang
It was new to me, but may be you are already aware of it. I was using
jdk 1.6 to run the tests on my windows pc and all tests passed. I
recognized that Bamboo failed (and eelco fixed it) but I couldn't
quite figure out why. Now I know. I changed jdk back to 1.4 and now it
works with eelco's chang
