+1 (binding)
Sig hashes validate wicket-examples jar runs when dropped into a
copy of Tomcat I had around.
The header-checking unit test fails on a couple of files but on visual
inspection they seem correct, so I suspect the test data first. (e.g.
Windows/Unix issues)
/Gwyn
On 26/03/07,
+1 for presenting this and then see what the outcome will be.
On 3/27/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
I noticed a few things.
README.txt
Shall we replace wicket-library.com with wicketstuff.org?
This seems like a preference, not a requirement.
On 27/03/07, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The header-checking unit test fails on a couple of files but on visual
inspection they seem correct, so I suspect the test data first. (e.g.
Windows/Unix issues)
Just for info, this is an issue with the Wicket LicenceChecker
UnitTest, specific
On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[x] yes submit apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha to the IPMC for
ratification
[ ] no, don't submit apache-wicket-1.3.0-incubating-alpha to the IPMC
Frank (binding)
i thought we were not shipping a bug free release. this is just a
development snapshot that we are shipping for legal purposes.
so while WICKET-424 may hold water ?, i dont think 422 or 423 do
-igor
On 3/26/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW corresponding issues are:
* Igor Vaynberg:
i thought we were not shipping a bug free release. this is
just a development snapshot that we are shipping for legal
purposes.
so while WICKET-424 may hold water ?, i dont think 422 or 423 do
Sure, WICKET-424 is a showstopper but not the others.
--
