+1 for presenting this and then see what the outcome will be.
On 3/27/07, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > I noticed a few things. > > README.txt > > Shall we replace wicket-library.com with wicketstuff.org? This seems like a preference, not a requirement. > NOTICE.txt > > Every NOTICE.txt file has duplicates: > > jdk-1.4/wicket/NOTICE.txt > jdk-1.4/wicket/target/classes/META-INF/NOTICE.txt > > jdk-1.4/wicket-datetime/NOTICE.txt > jdk-1.4/wicket-datetime/target/classes/META-INF/NOTICE.txt This is surely so that NOTICE files go into jar files. > NOTICE.txt again > > Mention that CreditCardValidator, WildcardMatcherHelper comes from > Apache Cocoon maybe. The code is ASL licensed so there's no major problem here. It would be polite to mention they came from Apache Cocoon, and should be done for future releases. I think this release can proceed without it. <snip/> > Unless there is something wrong on my side, I vote -1 so that we > can fix this blocker JMX loading problem at least. The rest are technical in nature and are thus irrelevant for the purpose of this vote. Do you still keep to your -1 vote? Note, I'm not to concerned about having an iteration or two with the IPMC. It isn't a major issue to show them a release, deal with some issues and roll another (apart from the time taken). Rather than reject this release and roll another, we should get this release in front of the IPMC now. Then when we roll our next, we can deal with these issues and any others the IPMC raises all in one go. Less work all round. Regards, Upayavira
