* Martijn Dashorst:
> I just want to add a thank you towards Vincent and Frédéric for
> staying with us in this (semi) heated discussion.
Indeed they are valiant and bold, I have fun working with them.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
* Martijn Dashorst:
> And since the related issue was first closed because another dev
> (Igor) didn't like the solution, I think this issue warranted a
> new, clear proposal and a vote before applying it.
Indeed I think we should try to summarize the discussions once the
thread activity has slo
OK,
I just want to add a thank you towards Vincent and Frédéric for
staying with us in this (semi) heated discussion.
Martijn
On 3/26/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
agreed
next time :)
-igor
On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/07, Igor Vaynberg
agreed
next time :)
-igor
On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we have reached a consensus in the discussion thread and it went quiet
so i
> assumed no one else had anything to say.
>
> like i said the controversy was
On 3/26/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we have reached a consensus in the discussion thread and it went quiet so i
assumed no one else had anything to say.
like i said the controversy was over the fact that it would do too much
magic/be automatic and that is why i closed the origin
we have reached a consensus in the discussion thread and it went quiet so i
assumed no one else had anything to say.
like i said the controversy was over the fact that it would do too much
magic/be automatic and that is why i closed the original jira issue as wont
fix. right now it is completely
On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't understand what's the big deal here.
The big deal is that there is a big discussion, and suddenly the
change is committed. Don't we have a process for changes that are
cont
