if you want to do it then fine by me
but i agree with Gwyn that we should avoid adding new stuff to 1.2 only
really needed fixes.
And try to focus on getting 1.3 as fast as possible out of the door.
johan
On 12/11/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL
I'm not even using 1.2 myself, so I don't need it. I thought it would
be a good improvement for a small price for many people. But as no-one
reacted that way, consider this vote scratched.
Eelco
On 12/12/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you want to do it then fine by me
but i
On 11/12/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] sure put it in 1.2.x
[ X] nah, people can do it themselves, let's not worry about it
My feeling is that at this point, we should be actively avoiding a new
1.2 release and not adding things.
On this specific point, surely existing
+0
I think discussing the benefits of not applying this patch to 1.2.4
will cost more than the actual act.
Eelco thinks it is worth his time to apply the patch, otherwise he
wouldn't have proposed the vote. The whole point of requiring a vote
is to remove the automatic knee jerk to apply
+1
On 12/10/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-159
We don't currently focus on the popped up window, which has the effect
that if the window with the same name already is open and in the back
ground, it will stay in the back ground.
