On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 08:47 +0100, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
here we go. You must remove all tests from *Test.java except the last one
(_10).
Thanks a lot for checking that for me!
I tried it and noticed that the only difference between my stuff and the
unit test is that my page is an
Thanks IgorThat worked fine. What am I missing though with PopupCloseLink? What does it do differently than a window.close() _javascript_ command i.t.o. cleaning up?
On 2/2/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i havent tried it so i am guessing:add an onclick handler to the popuplink markup
Is there any early plans to have some IDE plugins released for netbeans and eclipse for wicket?
Features Like:
Create a Wicket Project
- Auto Generation of the WebApplication Class code with General Config Dialog Boxex supporting setting HomePage etc
- Auto Generation of WebPage Class with thier
So, the problem is most probably not due to the code, but rather to my
stupidity. Any ideas where I could look?
usually it is due to some misspelling, brackets may be
Sorry for asking about this again... but I don't think it's the
spelling.
Can you help me decipher the error message?
you have wicket:head before (not inside) whatever other wicket
component, right?
Juergen
On 2/3/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the components are all added to the right container? The exception
message indicates that the markups component hierachy and the java
component
And the components are all added to the right container? The exception
message indicates that the markups component hierachy and the java
component hierarchy don't match
Juergen
On 2/3/06, David Leangen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the problem is most probably not due to the code, but
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/geertjan?entry=wicket_samples_as_netbeans_projects
http://www.laughingpanda.org/mediawiki/index.php/Wicket_BenchThe wicket bench is still under development, but is very promising. Geertjan is still very fond of Wicket and has done some work. I haven't looked at the
Hi.
I have to use a proxy (apache with mod_proxy) in front of my wicket
application.
This means that all redirects (and requests) must point to the proxy
server, not the wicket application.
So my question is: Where can I modify the construction of redirect URLs
in wicket?
Timo
Afaik Popup close link removes the popup page from pagemap.
-Matej
Thomas J du Plessis wrote:
Thanks Igor
That worked fine. What am I missing though with PopupCloseLink? What
does it do differently than a window.close() JavaScript command i.t.o.
cleaning up?
On 2/2/06, *Igor Vaynberg*
I was moving thru the examples on these link http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wicket-contrib-dojo/BasicTooltipTutorial.html
using Netbeans
However on deployment using Netbeans/Tomcat deploy, the browser was giving _javascript_ error [Object excpected...]. So out of curiousity i dug into the
I also use mod_proxy with wicket, but I have not encountered any need to
modify the urls.
What is causing you to do it?
/Flemming
Timo Stamm wrote:
Hi.
I have to use a proxy (apache with mod_proxy) in front of my wicket
application.
This means that all redirects (and requests) must
Hi all,
I'm looking for some advise on best-practice in passing information between
pages. My scenario:
- search for a list of people on first page
- create a DetachableModel from one person using an IPageLink on the results
- new page displays that persons detail, with a new listview of
both ways are good.the advantage of passing in a model is that you have more flexibility since the underlying telephone object can come from anywhere (its retrieval logic is hidden in the model). it is nice to have if you think you are going to need it down the road.
the biggest disadvantage to
Hello,
I would like to have access to an object (or objects) across several web
pages. Where should I keep this data? What solution do you recommend?
(This is some kind of the wizard pages)
Best regards,
Piotrek
---
This SF.net email is
Hi Flemming.
Thanks for asking, I guess my question was too unspecific.
Flemming schrieb:
I also use mod_proxy with wicket, but I have not encountered any need to
modify the urls.
What is causing you to do it?
It is a requirement of some important legacy apps and can't be
circumvented.
Hey all,I've started playing with AjaxSelfUpdatingTimerBehavior's in my simple wicket application (CVS snapshot of Wicket ~1day old) and noticed some odd behaviour:The moment the AJAX update occurs, if I submit any forms on the page, I get redirected to a Page Expired page. Is this configurable? I
On 2/4/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The request forwarding works flawlessly, but the redirect locationscreated by wicket point to the app server. This is what I expect, but Ineed these redirects to point to the proxy server.
>From memory mod_proxy has TWO options, the forward proxy, and
Mark Derricutt schrieb:
On 2/4/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The request forwarding works flawlessly, but the redirect locations
created by wicket point to the app server. This is what I expect, but I
need these redirects to point to the proxy server.
From memory mod_proxy has
And the components are all added to the right container? The exception
message indicates that the markups component hierachy and the java
component hierarchy don't match
I'm just adding it directly to the page (actually in one of the superclasses
of the page), exactly like in the JUnit tests.
19 matches
Mail list logo
