Yes, this works perfect now. Thank you.
On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 01:43 +0100, Johan Compagner wrote:
> sorry a LoadableDetachableModel is not a Model so:
>
> Model model = (Model)super.getObject(component);
>
> that can't be cast it to a IModel
>
> IModel model = (IModel)super.getObject(componen
This works...how "expensive" is it, really? I've noticed in my own
testing that copying the contents of one ArrayList into another can be
fairly resource intensive...is that what is happening in the
constructor?
Couldn't I avoid this by making my domain classes implement
Serializable? I believe
Hi, IAuthorizationStrategy wasn't very official yet, but for those of
you that were already using it, there has been an API break. The new
interface reflects better that authorization is queried, not applied:
public interface IAuthorizationStrategy
{
boolean isInstantiationAuthorized(Class
Your exception most likely stems from this issue:The list view constructor that throws the exception looks like this:public ListView(final String id, final List list) { this(id, new Model((Serializable)list)); }Since empList (java.util.RandomAccessSubList) does not implement Serializable you get t
Ok, I've just whipped up a simple page that demonstrates the problem I was having with ajax updates in a ListView not working.Theres two ajax timers at the root of the page, and 10 in a loop. Also note that the use of
MarkupIdSetter.INSTANCE crashes.I see the models for each ListItem update once
Telextreme - Telefonia VOIP
Olá , você vai conhecer agora a telefonia do futuro.
Estamos trazendo para o Brasil uma empresa de qualidade que atua a 10
anos no mercado, com mais 6 empresas no grupo é líder no mercado.
Você gostaria de ter um telefone 100% livre para lig
of course dont forget to detach the delegate model in the LeftHalfModel.-IgorOn 2/10/06, Igor Vaynberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:class EmployeeListModel extends LoadableDetachableModel {
protected Object load() { //get default directory Directory
class EmployeeListModel extends LoadableDetachableModel { protected Object load() { //get default directory Directory ed = DirectoryProxy.getDefaultWithEmployees
(); //get employees from directory List employees = ed.g
sorry a LoadableDetachableModel is not a Model so: Model model = (Model)super.getObject(component);that can't be cast it to a IModelIModel model = (IModel)super.getObject(component); instead.
johanOn 2/11/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, got it all setup and now it's complaining about the Lis
the split behavior can be encapsulated into a subclass of LoadableDetachableModel you can create. then your anonymous classes can extend from that if they have to at all.this is what OO is all about.-Igor
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This might put me in a bind then.What I showed you
Take a look at the examples projects too. The phonebook example should
be very usefull to give you an idea how to use typical database driven
applications.
Eelco
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try it...not being a Swing programmer and never really having to think
> about how t
Actually, it would be mixed, not entirely SSL. The user would browse products and would enter an SSL-enabled page at the point he would be entering personal/payment information.On 2/10/06,
Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
isn't that ssl problem a problem when you mix stuff?So non ssl pa
OK, got it all setup and now it's complaining about the ListView
objects...here's the code:
public class CheckIn extends WebPage
{
/**
* default ctor
*/
public CheckIn()
{
IModel loadingModel = new LoadableDetachableModel()
{
protected Object load(
I'll try it...not being a Swing programmer and never really having to think about how this type of event model works...I had no idea I could do it that way.Thanks very much for the info! I'll see what happens once I get it working.
On 2/10/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that looks
i think for that in 1.2 you could use the IRequestCodingStrategy (see WebRequestCodingStrategy) for that to make for specific pages a full url with https.Or you could use a ExternalLink component i guess where you have a bookmarkable page (the personal/payment section) to your own site..
Then you j
that looks like very wrong codeDon't know where these pieces of code are in: //get default directory Directory ed = DirectoryProxy.getDefaultWithEmployees(); //get employees from directory
List employees = ed.getEmployees();but if that is in a webpage constructor or som
isn't that ssl problem a problem when you mix stuff?So non ssl pages and a ssl pages? And you want to generate a (page)link that goes to a ssl one or the other way around?The default wicket doesn't generate the "http" "server" "port" part of the url only the "/" path. So that is or was a proble
This might put me in a bind then.What I showed you before was really a simplified, edited version of the code I'm really using.What I've got is similar only I have to split that single List into two other lists...doing something like this:
//get default directory Directory ed = Direc
The authentication strategy shouldn't have anything to do with it. The
cookie handling like we did before should work unaltered. Btw, the
strategy is used for all components, not just pages.
If you really want, you can use the request to get the request or
session to read the cookies there. WebReq
Thanks!
On 2/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's mentioned here:
> http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Listviews_in_a_form
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 2/10/06, Mats Norén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/10/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > // Just create a new
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>.and it may be
> what is causing my problems since I've spotted a comment here and there that
> Wicket doesn't support Java 5?
Wicket doesn't provide Java 5 specific features, but is fully
compliant with Java 1.4 and up, as long as Java is compliant betw
But actually that wasnt the intend. Before the authentication strategy
the cookie value was assigned to the form component automatically at
the beginning of the request (and I think it still is) and hence the
information was exactly where you would expect it. I dont know much
about the authenticati
if you think that is ugly, maybe wicket is not for you :)in wicket you use anonymous classes often. an alternative would be to make that anonymous class into a private static class, or if it is reusable make it a public static class.
unlike many other web frameworks out there wicket requires you to
Phew, that could get ugly. Could I fix this by making my domain classes serializable? Bare with me, I'm still pretty new to Java as well as Wicket :)On 2/10/06,
Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and if it is, looks like whatever list is returned is not serializable so wicket cannot wrap i
Yep, everything before that is Hibernate (3.1.x) doing it's thingThe three preceeding lines to what I posted were 3 sql queries being generated by Hibernateand there is nothing higher up showing any problems w/ hibernate.
Also, the same calls work fine in a Servlet/JSP MVC setupI just p
and if it is, looks like whatever list is returned is not serializable so wicket cannot wrap it with a model for you.here is how to fix that and make the model detacahable, which is good anyways:IModel listModel=new LoadableDetachableModel() {
Object load() { //get default directory
is that the root cause of the exception?-IgorOn 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to convert a single page of an existing application using Wicket...just to see how it works. The entire app was built on JDK
5.0. It uses hibernate and retrieves lists of data with generics...and i
I'm trying to convert a single page of an existing application using Wicket...just to see how it works. The entire app was built on JDK 5.0. It uses hibernate and retrieves lists of data with generics...and it may be what is causing my problems since I've spotted a comment here and there that Wic
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Wicket entirely stable when it comes to using Hibernate 3.1.x? Are there
> any "gotchas" or serious bugs when interacting w/ Hibernate?
There are no gotchas or bugs that come to mind. Perhaps you want to
use spring in conjunction, and then I would l
Yeah, I noticed this after I found some examples on the JavaLobby articles. Sorry, I hadn't spent enough time looking for this before posting.Has there been any talk of putting some (or all) of the R. J. Lorimer articles into the Wiki? I noticed a lot of the things his articles cover are missing
If you use a ListView, you have method populateItem that is called
when each item is created. Argument item holds the current index, and
item is where you attach your components, like icons, to.
Eelco
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've built several applications w/ ASP.NET in the
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to decide if I should use Wicket for an e-commerce project here
> at work. We're basically going to build a shopping cart which integrates
> into existing financial and payment-processing systems that already exist
> in-house.
>
> So, the fir
I've built several applications w/ ASP.NET in the past and got very comfortable w/ the built-in events that fire for some of the web UI controls that come bundled w/ the framework.I was curious if there was an event (or something similar in concept) that happens when each row is created in a table
I'm trying to decide if I should use Wicket for an e-commerce project here at work. We're basically going to build a shopping cart which integrates into existing financial and payment-processing systems that already exist in-house.
So, the first things that come to mind are;Is Wicket entirely stab
I need to finish this for 1.2. I've had some hard drive problems
which have taken priority.
On 2/8/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Heudecker gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I'm working on adding the functionality to Wicket. Should be a few more
> > days.
>
> How did this work
Description:
I'm using a ListMultipleChoice component to populate a List model object.
When the user selects multiple items in the list, I want the list model
object to be populated with those items.
Problem:
The ListMultipleChoice renders correctly with all the proper 'choices' and
corresponding
The closing of the session is not so much of a problem. The problem is
that those objects themselve hold references to the session when they
have lazy collections (which is the default in Hibernate 3+). And that
session is stale after the request (as you close the session).
I'm not sure whether th
I am keeping references of the objects though...as I am passing the objects around, not just references to some of the properties of the object(s).As I understand it, however, closing the Session in a Filter will ensure that the session gets closed at the proper time and I should not have a problem
Hello,
Thanks for your offer, but that is really something for the publisher
to decide. When the time comes, we might propose such a thing on this
list. But at this time, we are just not far enough with the book.
I am one more interested in the book proofreading :)
Best regards,
Piotr
Yeah, even though there are this disadvantages, it is a really good
idea to use detachable models when you work with Hibernate. Or unproxy
your objects before you keep them as state.
In fact, the example that you gave would be fine, as you are not
holding the actual hibernate object, but just get
What we want is a generic model. IModel> etc.
Eelco
On 2/10/06, VGJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll have to forgive my ignorance as I've only been using Java for about a
> year, but - why can't generics be used? Wouldn't you still be able to use a
> List without supplying a type (i.e. new A
It's mentioned here:
http://wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Listviews_in_a_form
Eelco
On 2/10/06, Mats Norén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > // Just create a new table, which will be put into the
> > current cell
> >l
Ugh...not sure I like that solution...you described exactly why too.I'm using Hibernate and I'm opening my sessions in my DAO layer and closing them w/ a Filter...will this still affect me (i.e. stale sessions)?? I just started using Wicket yesterday so I'm a poppin-fresh newbie.
On 2/10/06, Eelco
You'll have to forgive my ignorance as I've only been using Java for about a year, but - why can't generics be used? Wouldn't you still be able to use a List without supplying a type (i.e. new ArrayList() vs. new ArrayList()) - thus making it backward-compatible? I've only really gotten serious a
There are, but it is undecided yet. It won't happen for 1.x, because
we want to support all the people that are using Wicket now with JDK
1.4. For 2.0 that might be another question, which still has to be
decided upon - but which at least has a few proponents, including
yours truely.
Eelco
On 2/
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/10/2006 6:31 PM) :#
That's exactly what we did. And we made a simple - but for many cases
useful - reference implementation in project wicket-auth-roles/
wicket-auth-roles-examples. Not completely done but, but far en
Are there any thoughts about using generics?
On 2/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, that's it. Instead of passing your domain object directly, you
> might consider putting it behind a IModel instance:
>
> public class HeaderPanel extends Panel
> {
>public HeaderPanel
On 2/10/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> // Just create a new table, which will be put into the
> current cell
>listItem.add(new CheckBox("selected", new
> PropertyModel(listItem.getModelObject(), "selected")));
>}
>});
>
> Is
On 2/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And remember to set optimizeItemRemoval to true when you work with
> ListViews in Forms.
Where?
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 2/10/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > // Just create a new table, which will be put into the
> > current cell
Yep, that's it. Instead of passing your domain object directly, you
might consider putting it behind a IModel instance:
public class HeaderPanel extends Panel
{
public HeaderPanel(String id, IModel blog)
{
super(id);
add(new Label("name", new PropertyMo
Ah, that explains it :)
I've opened up an issue for working with page maps:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1428624&group_id=119783&atid=684978
The first fix is in, but we might do some more refactoring to get
things a bit more secure and strong typed before we are done.
And remember to set optimizeItemRemoval to true when you work with
ListViews in Forms.
Eelco
On 2/10/06, karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> // Just create a new table, which will be put into the
> current cell
>listItem.add(new CheckBox("selected", new
> PropertyMo
you can access the request cycleRequestCycle.get()and from there access the request and the cookies.-IgorOn 2/10/06, Mark Derricutt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On 2/11/06, Juergen Donnerstag <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> But you don't persist the form. What you did is almost what> setPersistent() as
yes, you are on the right track. in wicket the simplest solution is usually the right one.-IgorOn 2/10/06, V. Jenks <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm having a little trouble understanding how to use Panels correctly.
I'm trying to convert a JSP that has many JSP 2.0 tagfile "includes" ofwhich I pass o
That's exactly what we did. And we made a simple - but for many cases
useful - reference implementation in project wicket-auth-roles/
wicket-auth-roles-examples. Not completely done but, but far enough to
get people started and to provde that the basic mechanism of
IAuthorizationStrategy works..
E
On 2/11/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But you don't persist the form. What you did is almost what
> setPersistent() as well. As I mentioned, only the values of the
> formcomponent, not the form is stored in the cookies.
Ok, got that. But I still don't see a means to read th
You're right. In the case where account name is encoded into the URL
and Google manages to index it somehow (i.e. there is no password
required) then we'll definitely see problems.
Maybe we should just add
BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy.excludeArgument(String
queryParamete
I'm having a little trouble understanding how to use Panels correctly.
I'm trying to convert a JSP that has many JSP 2.0 tagfile "includes" of
which I pass objects into so they can display some of the data that the
"master" JSP tag displays.
In Wicket, I've re-created the tagfiles as Panels and I
On Friday 10 Feb 2006 01:04, Gili wrote:
> For example, if you have a multi-page image gallery, specifying page=0
> would be optional, since it is the default page that gets viewed unless
> you specify otherwise.
>
Again, generally all parameters passed to a page are passed for a reason -
t
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/9/2006 8:10 AM) :#
On second thought, please do volunteer. I was informed that we
actually need a couple of proof readers pretty soon. I'll contact you
about this later.
Thanks!
Eelco
Hope I am still on your list
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying (astral date:
2/9/2006 6:46 PM) :#
the problem with writing integration for acegi is that its such a beast.
there is a 1000 ways to integrate with it, so how can we write a single
authentication implementation that can handle all 1000
On 2/10/06, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd have to look a little deeper into it, but as far as I remember we
> > already allow to encrypt/decrypt the password. And BTW only the
>
> The problem there is that I don't rea
// Just create a new table, which will be put into the
current cell
listItem.add(new CheckBox("selected", new
PropertyModel(listItem.getModelObject(), "selected")));
}
});
Is this the problem? (you had getModel( ) in your code)
I remember ha
On 2/10/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd have to look a little deeper into it, but as far as I remember we
> already allow to encrypt/decrypt the password. And BTW only the
The problem there is that I don't really want to persist the form. As
(I guess) the only way to get
On 2/10/06, Mark Derricutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So basically I'm wanting an arbitrary way of getting/setting cookies
> from any Page, or other part of wicket.
Ok so I'm now storing a cookie with:
Cookie cookie = new Cookie("username", username);
cookie.setMaxAge((int) Duration.ONE_WEEK.g
There has been a ListItem/AjaxHandler issue which I haven't fixed yet.
As Bryns Page seems not to contain any ListViews etc. it should work.
I'd need a junit test case to take a closer look at it. Bryn: might
you sending me one?
Juergen
On 2/10/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you
I'd have to look a little deeper into it, but as far as I remember we
already allow to encrypt/decrypt the password. And BTW only the
content of the formcomponent is stored in the cookies, nothing else.
What probably is not covered is that you mix/match/modify the
formcomponents to be persisted.
J
Hey all, got a question about persistent data/cookies.
I see you can call setPersistent() on a FormComponent object, but in
my current way of thinking this wouldn't really help as I don't have
arbitrary access to the form.
What I'm wanting to do is set a cookie in the brower with a
username+passw
Why do you think so? It is intentional. It allows you to show another
modal (nested) dialog.
Only thing that is a problem is that doing this several times can result
in page expiration error, when returning back.
Therefore I'd like to put the page in modal dialog in separate pagemap
and after th
69 matches
Mail list logo
