Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

please add a bug report, and describe or attach a test what you exactly do.johanOn 3/4/06, jan_bar < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302).It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm. TheMyForm inherits from

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are done. Juergen On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302). > It seems that wicket:header doesn't work. My WebPage contains a MyForm. The > MyForm inheri

Re: [Wicket-user] previewable pages

I have yet to see a real life example where multiple levels of inheritence is *critical* for an offline preview. With a little more CSS work, the preview could use a special background image or color to emphasize that it's simply a preview. In order for this to truly be a "wicket feature", i thin

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

That's news to me. So when is used? You might want to update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem. Gili Juergen Donnerstag wrote: in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are done. Juergen On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am migrati

[Wicket-user] PageMaps and iFrames

Hi allI have an iFrame that contains a BookmarkablePage, like this:while furnace.BasketPage is (of course) a class that extends WebPage. My problem is that the page within the iFrame gets refreshed regularly, and appears not to refresh i.e. the controls are not updated.  It behaves almost like a pa

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

The is ignored because the MyForm markup is in read by Wicket. So how can I add markup to Form? Jan "jan_bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302). > It seems that wicket:header doesn't wor

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Just a side note, the wicket:header should be wicket:head, the code is correct, the message title and text has typo. Jan "jan_bar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > I am migrating Wicket 1.1.1 application to Wicket 1.2 (snapshot 20060302). > It seems that wicke

[Wicket-user] markup/java location

Hi, Can you please explain how can I place markup and Java files in different directories ? Thanks Nili --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Atten

[Wicket-user] Porting to 1.2 -- using getSession().invalidate()

In 1.1, given a runtime exception of type "SecurityException", I'd forward to a special error page that then calls getSession().invalidate() to log the user out. The special error page would render and then the session would be invalidated, causing additional clicks to forward to the login page

Re: [Wicket-user] markup/java location

there has been a thread on this recently. please search the mailing list. there is also a wiki entry i believe.the gist involved is creating your own implemenation of IResouceStreamLocator and registering that with resource settings. -IgorOn 3/5/06, Nili Adoram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,Can you

Re: [Wicket-user] Porting to 1.2 -- using getSession().invalidate()

You can't do a redirect then.If you want to show a final page you have to show that page without a redirectIf you do a redirect then the session is expired so we can't show the page anymoreBecause of 2 things, 1 in 1.2 we cleanup a invalidated session much betterRedirect buffers are now cleared. a

Re: [Wicket-user] PageLink called request two times

Hi Johan, It's felt that PageLink not relate to this problem. For a fact doGet was called two times. I deleted wicket-1.2-20060227-0200.jar from WEB-INF/lib and imported Wicket sources(wicket-1.2-20060227-0200\src\java\wicket) for debug. So doGet and onBeginRequest is called just one time. Relate

Re: [Wicket-user] PageLink called request two times

Sorry, when import sources, this problem is same. doGet is called two times. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PageLink-called-request-two-times-t1205926.html#a3256582 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. ---

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

> That's news to me. So when is used? In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of the output. > You might want to > update the Wiki entry so more people don't run into this problem. The whole purpose of the wiki is so that anybody can contribute. The developers a

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

David Leangen wrote: That's news to me. So when is used? In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of the output. But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a Page a component too? So is Page different from other components in that its is automaticall

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 23:09 -0500, Gili wrote: > > David Leangen wrote: > >>That's news to me. So when is used? > > > > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of > > the output. > > But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't a > Page a component

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

In http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Markup_inheritance it reads: " does not make sense in page markup (but does in inherited page markup)" I plan on changing this to: " is not necessary in Page markup. Wicket interprets as automatically." Any objections?

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Leangen wrote:>>  That's news to me. So when is used?>> In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of> the output. But Juergen said " in Pages don't make any sense". Isn't aPage a component too? So is Page different fr

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Igor Vaynberg wrote: On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: David Leangen wrote: >> That's news to me. So when is used? > > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the of > the output. But Juerge

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

On 3/5/06, Gili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote:> On 3/5/06, *Gili* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: David Leangen wrote:>  >>  That's news to me. So when is used?>  >>  > In borders and components when you want to contribute to the > of> 

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Hi Juergen, you got it wrong, the is for Form, not Page, see me other post. Jan "Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in Pages don't make any sense. Just remove it and you are done. Juergen On 3/4/06, jan_bar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I a

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

form doesnt have its own markup, so how can it have a wicket:head tag associated with it?-IgorOn 3/5/06, jan_bar < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi Juergen,you got it wrong, the is for Form, not Page, see me other post.Jan"Juergen Donnerstag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messagenews:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .

[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

I will try to express myself better and I will add bug report if needed.   In Wicket 1.1 I had a ValidatedForm class that inherits from Form. That class does client form validation (uses fvalidate scripts). The ValidatedForm needs to add the scripts (and css) to the Page markup where the for

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

I assumed the example given by Jan was a Page (Page => derived from Page.java) because of the html structure (body tag etc and no wicket:extend, wicket:panel etc.). A standard normal Page does not need . You can place your component in and add() them. Panels , Borders and extended pages may hav

[Wicket-user] Re: Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

Exactly. But in Wicket 1.1 it had markup. See my other reply to Johan why I need it.   Thanks, Jan "Igor Vaynberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...form doesnt have its own markup, so how can it have a wicket:head tag associated with it?-Igor On 3/5/06

Re: [Wicket-user] Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

> you got it wrong, the is for Form, not Page, see me other > post. (based on your markup) I assume the Form is added to the Page. The Form's markup is contained in the Page's markup. In that sense only components with associated markup files are relevant (like panel, border, extends). Juergen

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Wicket 1.2 and wicket:header

I agree with the inconvenience Jan has. I have an other example... I was working on a slider this weekend, based on the Yahoo slider javascript component. It would be nice to let this be a form component that can participate in form validation, population, etc, but also to use markup with this for

[Wicket-user] Re:Wicket-user digest, Vol 1 #1833 - 9 msgs

help --- Begin Message --- Send Wicket-user mailing list submissions to wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to