his project is active
or should I say being actively worked on.
-Craig
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> some projects have small scope, and once that scope is covered there is
> simply nothing more to do. have you checked it out - does something not
> work
> for you?
>
> -i
Does anyone know if this project is active or not? IE, is someone actively
doing development on this project?
Thanks
Craig
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-hibernate-behavior-tf4240106.html#a12064913
Sent from the Wicket - User (OLD) mailing list archive at Na
Tim,
And how are you overriding the "goToPageB" method in the test? Using
WicketTester you never actually create an instance of PageB, that is you as
the developer.
-Craig
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Ingram Chen wrote:
>
>> We also suffer the same issues here. But due to
ection make code slight complex and MyFactory is still
> hard to test, either.
>
>
> On 7/17/07, Craig Lenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm looking for some feedback as to an issue I'm having with the
>> WicketTester. To start I'
age") {
> setResponsePage(myFactory.newBPage());
> });
> }
> }
>
> and swapping mock MyFactory while testing.
>
> But such extra indirection make code slight complex and MyFactory is still
> hard to test, either.
>
>
> On 7/17/07, Craig Le
I guess saying "I don't care about page B" is a little harsh. I care that
when the link is clicked that the next page to be rendered is page B, what I
don't care about is that page B was actually rendered.
So I don't think mocking up the page is the proper solution. Instead I
would want to mock
Jean-Baptiste Quenot-3 wrote:
>
> * Craig Lenzen:
>
>> I'm looking for some feedback as to an issue I'm having with the
>> WicketTester. To start I'd like to point out that I'm using
>> Spring and injecting my pages / components via the wicket s
I'm looking for some feedback as to an issue I'm having with the
WicketTester. To start I'd like to point out that I'm using Spring and
injecting my pages / components via the wicket spring project's component
injector.
Here is the situation, I have page A that has a link to page B. In the test
they were in
> "draft" or "review". Are they actually available now, and if so, who's
> using them?
>
> On 7/12/07, Craig Lenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks Al, I look forward to the post.
>>
>> -Craig
>>
&g
Thanks Al, I look forward to the post.
-Craig
Al Maw wrote:
>
> Craig Lenzen wrote:
>> Sorry, I was a little confused, I thought this project was using the JPA
>> annotations for validation. Instead you are actually using the hibernate
>> validator project annot
>
> component.add(StringValidator.maximumLength(max));
> }
> });
>
>
> On 7/11/07, Craig Lenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Fair enough Ryan, but one question for you.
>>
>> Does this only
ations on a production/live site
> and they've made my life easier. no more hibernate exceptions bubbling up
> to the screen because a field was left blank.
>
> On 7/11/07, Craig Lenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Has anyone made heavy use of thi
Has anyone made heavy use of this project yet? Any issues or concerns?
-Craig
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-hibernate-behavior/
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 7/11/07, Craig Lenzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Unless I was dreaming this the other night I swear someone announced that
they created a wicket stuff project that added form validation based on JPA
annotations of a domain model? Was I dreaming, if not I can't seem to find
the project in wicket stuff.
Thanks
Craig
--
View this message in cont
> A subject is the root/ abstract entity for a user, principals are
> views or identities of a subject and in JAAS you would represent a
> role as a principal.
I agree with your statement which leads me to the fact that the principal
should really be a role in swarm and the hive file is a mapping
15 matches
Mail list logo
