That sounds great. I used Wicket over a year ago and am about to
build another site using it so this sounds like a good refresher.
On 15 Jun 2007, at 09:09, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I am interested, but geographically challenged. However, there are
> some online tools available to help us pla
s that is the deciding factor?
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/13/07, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:31, Frank Bille wrote:
>>
>>> I get the same error and have tried to remove local jar files. I'll
>>> look into it tonig
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:31, Frank Bille wrote:
> I get the same error and have tried to remove local jar files. I'll
> look into it tonight (can't get workspace setup using new "al"
> structure)
>
Great, cheers. Until then I have checked out the last revision
before the restructuring.
-
header field
>>
On 13 Mar 2007, at 12:02, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> Probably you have remove the jars from your local repository and
> build again.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 3/13/07, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get this error
Hi,
I get this error message when trying to build wicket:
ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
error: error reading /Users/john/.m2/repository/org/apache/wicket/
wicket/1.3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wicket-
reverted to 1.3 anyway...
On 5 Mar 2007, at 17:44, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
in latest 1.3 the wicket path param should not be necessary because
wicket will scan your web.xml to find it for you
-igor
On 3/5/07, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have reverted to Wicket 1.3 now beca
, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> How did you configure the filter in web.xml?
>
> Eelco
>
> On 2/26/07, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to use the wicket filter in trunk but cannot get it to
>> respond to a url to my home pa
Hi,
I am trying to use the wicket filter in trunk but cannot get it to
respond to a url to my home page. The same problem seems to happen
with the phonebook app. When I run the phonebook app I enter http://
localhost:8080/phonebook which redirects to http://localhost:8080/
phonebook/app.
Hi,
I have checked out the latest wicket 2.0 code from apache and the
phonebook from Sourceforge and everything compiles correctly after
changing some onSubmit methods from protected to public.
The phonebook home page displays correctly but no links work... maybe
because they have links lik
Hi,
I need to add a behaviour to a link so that when it is clicked
several other component are made visible. I could do this with an
AJAX link but it seems that this might be better acheived with a
simple bit of client side script.
Is there any existing behaviour to to this sort of thing o
This sounds like the problem I came across a few weeks ago:http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.wicket.user/13599/focus=13605I solved it by creating a new workspace and importing all my projects again.I reported this bug to Eclipse and they said that it was a problem with the classpath format ch
Hi Ingram,I have been using Wicket in a Webwork based application which I imagine would be very similar to what you want to do. Both frameworks register a Servlet to handle requests and can be mapped to any servlet path. I have had no problems switching from pages in one framework to the other.
Check this out! First listing is a .gov.uk website giving info on DDA. The Googlebot indexed a page saying "Your browser does not support _javascript_!". Clearly they don't regard _javascript_ as a problem.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=dda+support+_javascript_+worthing&btnG=SearchThe
d> > > is that a new page instance is created instead of looked up from session > > > stored, and then processing continues as usual.> > >> > > -Igor> > >> > >> > >> > > On 6/13/06, John Patterson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Fascinating. I had never heard of DDA compliance before but a little
Googling makes me realise that I should really take notice.
Especially the part about sites like Priceline.com being successfully
sued over their accessibility.
http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-
a
Perhaps all 1.2 compliant stuff could be copied into the wicket-stuff/
WICKET_1_2 branch so we know what should work.
On 22 Jun 2006, at 01:45, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I tried (a 0.4 snapshot version of ) dojo with 1.2, but that got
> several exceptions. After putting the most recent (soon to
Nice one! It is so fundamental and has always seemed odd to me. That interface almost put me off using Wicket when I first checked it out. I know that is a very superficial attitude, but first impressions are important. I think I may have even hit the back button and then returned for another l
Cheers Igor, that has really put things into perspective. The lack of decent documentation for Pico means that I have spent countless hours getting things to work the way I want. I suspect that I might switch to Spring when I get some time.John.On 15 Jun 2006, at 13:17, Igor Vaynberg wrote:On 6/1
Igor, sorry to turn this into a Spring Q&A! I understand if you don't want to discuss Spring on this list but it is hard to get an unbiased opinion on theirs.I have only briefly looked at Springs IoC and was put off by the amount of configuration XML I would have to write. I use Picocontainer whi
ession
>> stored, and then processing continues as usual.
>>
>> -Igor
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/13/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13 Jun 2006, at 19:55, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or maybe ther
On 13 Jun 2006, at 19:55, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Or maybe there will be more trade offs. Depends on how badly people
> want it, and who will work on it. In 2.0, Johan built in a form that
> posts back to a bookmarkable page, so you can even build pages with
> forms that are still stateless.
>
>
Just a quick question about how this will work in 2.0; is it
possible to have a page that has a normal link with an onClick
handler which is not stored in the session?
In this case the link target would need to specify both the
BookmarkablePage and the Listener to call and when the target i
g the API docs not to implement that interface directly
>> (and I
>> > > wouldn't know any advantage to do that), it means you don't
>> have a
>> > > drop in.
>> > >
>> > > So before you do a lot of work, you might want to wait
On 8 Jun 2006, at 18:17, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> I'm just about to check in changes that - finally - lets Wicket defer
> session creation until it is actually needed. The change is done for
> 2.0/ trunk, but we're currently voting on whether it is worth an API
> break. IBehavior has one addition
On 6 Jun 2006, at 09:56, Ben Fortuna wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been investigating the possibilities of integrating Wicket and
> OSGi with favourable results. However, one major hurdle, which I think
> a couple of others have also pointed out here, is that there is as yet
> no solution providing "
On 8 Jun 2006, at 09:52, Johan Compagner wrote:
> you could return your own versions of ISessionStore
> that pretty much doesn't do anything..
> Dont know if that always works..
Thanks, I think I will try this approach and see what happens! I
will be building a new site in the next month or t
On 8 Jun 2006, at 01:43, Timo Stamm wrote:
> Are you sure this issue is that important? In my experience, Google
> does
> index pages with a session id parameter in the URL. The session id is
> stripped in the search result URL, so I don't see any problems.
See the quotes in my previous post fr
On 8 Jun 2006, at 05:10, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
>
> Or make your own buffered response object
> (WebApplication.newWebResponse())
> and override in the response object the
> public CharSequence encodeURL(CharSequence url)
>
> but then you have to analize the url and know which one you want to
On 7 Jun 2006, at 22:15, Igor Vaynberg wrote:Because wicket components are stateful that state needs to live somewhere. So far it can only live in session for wicket 1.2 or on client in wicket 2.0. Thanks for the update. I look forward to using this new facility.Maybe in 2.0 what we do is check fo
On 7 Jun 2006, at 17:32, Eelco Hillenius wrote:Well, people can still argue whether it is in Google's way or not. Seemy comment at http://technically.us/n8/articles/2006/05/07/baking-for-google#commentsI have read quotes on Matt Cutts blog that session ids should be avoided. Also quotes from Googl
Hi,
I was wondering what the current state of wicket is regarding not
adding a JSESSIONID to pages served to search engine bots? Also, are
http sessions still created if I use only bookmarkable pages and
don't want to store any application session state?
Thanks,
John.
__
Hi all,Here is a tip for Wicket users following Eclipse milestone builds.I have recently upgraded Eclipse to 3.2RC7 from M5a and it broke my launch configurations. It auto-upgrades them to a new format and annoyingly removes resources in your source directories from the classpath. Because wicket
You can either implement your transaction handling in your business
objects that are simply called from wicket or if you really want
transactional code in your pages you can subclass WebRequestCycle and
override the methods:
onRuntimeException() - rollback transaction
onEndRequest() - commi
John Patterson wrote:
Do you mean the RedirectPage in the library application? If so, can you
explain why such a page is needed to logout? I thought that
Session.invalidate() waits until after the request is finished anyway?
Regarding the RedirectPage being used in the sample wicket
Johan Compagner wrote:
there are other examples
What if a new link doesn't make a new page? But just sets a new modelobject?
Good example! It seems to me that the most common case would be simply
creating a new page in a new window. In this case I can't see why it is
necessary to clone the
John Patterson wrote:
I thought that whenever I click on a link, a new page object is created?
If the link opens in a new window then why would the page need to exist
in the old page map at all? It was never shown in that window.
So I can understand the use case, can you give me an example
Johan Compagner wrote:
Yes that is it.
The page that you are showing now in a different window can also be
displayed in another window.
So we can't move it because it also have to exist with its different
versions in the pagemap it came from.
I thought that whenever I click on a link, a ne
Ashley Aitken wrote:
So the pages are only serialised when the session is serialised for
replication. I am not sure how Wicket (or if it is even within Wicket's
scope) handles replication/clustering, but if one were using sticking
sessions (sessions mapped to the same server in the cluster) th
Done.On 3 May 2006, at 15:39, Johan Compagner wrote:that is currently not possiblewe don't have a PageMap.redirectToInterceptPage(final Class pageClass)only a Pagecan you add a feature request for this?johan On 5/3/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,I would like users to
e>> can you add a feature request for this? >> johan>>> On 5/3/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>>> Hi,>>>> I would like users to be able to bookmark my login page with a nice >> link. I have mounted the page and tested that this l
Hi,
I would like users to be able to bookmark my login page with a nice
link. I have mounted the page and tested that this link does indeed take
you to my LoginPage. However, when users are redirected to this page by
redirectToInterceptPage the page url is not the bookmarkable one
(/member/
Hi,
Are there any instructions on how to build wicket-contrib-beanedit?
There seems to be many missing packages ie net.sf.ipn.app.page
There also seems to be some kind of auto generated classes that are not
included eg net.sf.ipn.data.auto._User
Thanks,
John
TECTED]> wrote:
> > this is the exact usecase i am working on, should be done by tonight at
> > some point.
> >
> > -Igor
> >
> > On 3/23/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have added a Feedb
Hi,
I have added a FeedbackMessages instance to my session class so that I can add
messages that will be displayed on the next page shown to the user. After
being displayed they will be cleared.
It looks to me as if the I should be able to override the
newFeedbackMessageModel() method to retu
On Wednesday 22 Mar 2006 08:44, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> There is no work planned on such a thing, but you are welcome to provide an
> implementation :-)
>
Cool. Yes I would love to... I am about to go on Safari in Venezeula for
three weeks! I recall someone saying a number of months ago that
On Wednesday 22 Mar 2006 08:29, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> I think the last time we discussed that topic the conclusion was that
> no immediate action is required as most applications which require
> https tend to have only a very limited number of http pages.
>
This doesn't really sound right to
.
Is there any work planned on this already?
On Wednesday 22 Mar 2006 04:38, Johan Compagner wrote:
> the only thing i can think of right now is use the ExternalLink to specify
> the full url
> where you want to move to
>
> johan
>
> On 3/21/06, John Patterson <[EMAIL P
Hi,
Is there a standard way to handle switching between http and https?
Thanks,
John.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
Hi,
Is there a standard way to handle switching between http and https?
Thanks,
John.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
On Wednesday 01 Mar 2006 13:51, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
> What do you need it for?
>
I am migrating my web application from WebWork to Wicket. All new
functionality is written in Wicket but I need to share some objects with the
old code such as the currently logged in user. This is stored in
Hi,
I am using a wicket 1.2 version from cvs from about 2 wekks ago. There seems
to be no way to access the HttpSession. Is this still true?
John.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends
Sourceforge anonymous cvs access is hopeless. You will need to try during off
peak hours or retry many times until you can get a connection.
On Wednesday 01 Mar 2006 08:30, Nili Adoram wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to checkout wicket-stuff from cvs at sourceforge according to
> the instructions at
> ht
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
In the hope that we will have both sooner.
On Thursday 16 Feb 2006 21:33, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a non-binding (the developers ultimately decide) call votes
> concerning whether we should
On Tuesday 14 Feb 2006 11:43, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> move. I am always in favor of clarity and breaking early in these
> matters.
>
I would certainly rather see wicket become a better framework than be held
back by backwards compatibility. Those who are not willing to refactor their
ui code
On Friday 10 Feb 2006 01:04, Gili wrote:
> For example, if you have a multi-page image gallery, specifying page=0
> would be optional, since it is the default page that gets viewed unless
> you specify otherwise.
>
Again, generally all parameters passed to a page are passed for a reason -
t
On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 15:15, Gili wrote:
> You misunderstood. I wasn't saying you should be removing parameters. I
> was suggesting you canonicalize them. That is, if a user hits:
> foo.html?a=1&b=2&c=3 but this is identical to foo.html?a=1 (because b=2
> and c=3 are default values) than yo
On Thursday 09 Feb 2006 11:33, Gili wrote:
> I don't think this necessary has anything to do with your URL scheme.
> It has to do with having different URLs returning the same (or very
> similar) content.
As you have written immediately below, the problem IS due to the URL scheme.
People n
Igor Vaynberg gmail.com> writes:
> its pretty easy to create an encoder that will process regular url
> formatted parameters. maybe that is a better default eventhough it is
> not as crawler friendly as the other one. you can also change your own
> implementation to the default by calling
> appli
Nick Heudecker gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'm working on adding the functionality to Wicket. Should be a few more
> days.
How did this work go? Is there a recommended way to enforce pages to use
https?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored b
Hi Wicketeers,
I have a page which can only be viewed if the user is logged in. If the user
is not logged in then checkAccess() redirects to a sign in page and returns
false.
I moved my "page building" code to the onBeginRequest() method so that it is
only called when it is really needed (ie
On Tuesday 20 Dec 2005 04:53, Johan Compagner wrote:
> it was there really at the beginning. But then developers complained that
> it was really difficult to have youre own request cycle
> because you needed to first make youre own SessionFactory then youre own
> Session then youre own RequestCycle
On Monday 19 Dec 2005 09:33, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> No need for that anymore, it's 'fixed' now (though I don't entirely
> agree as I stated in another thread).
>
Thanks guys! I have used WebWork previously and this is my first Wicket
project. I think it is bloody brilliant. I am really looki
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 23:10, John Patterson wrote:
> I have checked it out and it looks to me like the method
> HibernateApplication.onRuntimeException() is never used so transactions
> will never be rolled back. Despite this missing functionality it is still
> much more complicate
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 22:00, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> you dont need an ejb container to run spring. just like pico you can start
> it via a servlet listener.
I meant that both spring and EJB provide managed transaction demarcation.
Neither of which I am using.
> did you look at the solution i i
005 19:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On 12/17/05, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ahh yes this does sound like a better approach. I have never used Spring
> > before. a couple of questions:
> >
> > Can you call multiple operations on your service interfaces i
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 19:24, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > Can you call multiple operations on your service interfaces in the same
> > transaction? Or is this not done?
>
> yes. if you mark your service method as PROPOGATION_REQUIRED it will join a
> transaction if one exists, or start a new one if o
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 18:31, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> of course i dont have txn management code in every event handler, i use
> spring. my service methods are demarkated with their txn attributes and
> spring handles it all for me transparently via aop. my wicket code knows
> nothing about transac
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 17:42, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> imho, your transactions should only
> be concerned with what happens in event handlers (onclick/onsubmit) and not
> through the enitire request cycle
Are you suggesting putting transaction handling in each wicket event handler?
--
On Saturday 17 Dec 2005 15:19, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> you might not be able to do it using the try/catch/finally semantic, but
> there are plenty of hooks in there to do it without. the
> iexceptionresponsestrategy is indirectly part of the cycle as well.
So the answer is no, you cannot have trans
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 23:35, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> why not instead of using a filter subclass webrequestcycle and all the
> transaction logic into it. its all in one place and neat. i think there are
> ample hooks for the keypoints you need.
WebRequestCycle does not have a hook to capture excepti
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 18:35, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> the full name of the interface is:
> wicket.request.compound.IExceptionResponseStrategy.
Cheers. I just did a cvs update and there it was! Wow, a lot has changed.
One small thing - the implementation of IExceptionResponseStrategy. is named
De
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 14:27, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> if you really want to you are free to cutomize any piece of request cycle
> processing you want, in this case take a look at
> IExceptionResponseStrategy.
I can't find this interface... but for the reasons of simplicity and keeping
all transacti
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 14:27, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i think it is reasonable that wicket
> catches all runtime exceptions that originate within its ui-tier. it needs
> to do that in order to show an error page. if it lets the exception go then
> what is responsible for showing the error page?
I ag
> > It also creates a new transaction for every data operation which does not
> > allow for making multiple operations atomic.
>
> Not true. Our base dao has methods for batching saves, updates and the
> like that use the currently running transaction, with 1 single method
> call you can then comm
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 02:47, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> There is in fact an on error handler Application.onRuntimeException(). its
> called whenever there is a runtime exception. instead of trying to do
> try/catch in your filter you can use a request variable to indicate
> success/failure. set it to s
On Friday 16 Dec 2005 05:40, Maurice Marrink wrote:
> We use the dao pattern. any exceptions are handled by the different dao's.
This would require duplicating error and transaction handling in every method.
It also creates a new transaction for every data operation which does not
allow for makin
Hi,
I am using hibernate with my wicket application and was wondering how I can
control transactions? Usually I use a servlet filter that either commits the
current transaction or rolls it back.
Something like this:
try
{
chain.doFilter(req, resp);
// commit if needed
}
catch (Exception
On Wednesday 07 Dec 2005 11:17, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> It's not the images, but the source code examples... An even greater
> disaster. Gwynn, are you listening?
They are still available in Google's cache:
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:j8nGc9VwnnEJ:www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/
Hi,
There is a problem on the Wiki where all images appear as some kind of
identifier.
John.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that make
79 matches
Mail list logo
