For non-committers:
svn switch http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk
For committers:
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/trunk
Regards, Upayavira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk In
#x27;t require you to be a committer to track down and fix any of
these bugs.
Regards, Upayavira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log event
owever, I still would not support setting up Fisheye against an Apache
SVN without infrastructure's support as they are the ones that would
have to pick up the pieces if it were to go wrong.
That need be little more than an email and wait for a response. So not
necessarily onerous.
Regards, U
owever, I still would not support setting up Fisheye against an Apache
SVN without infrastructure's support as they are the ones that would
have to pick up the pieces if it were to go wrong.
Regards, Upayavira
-
This S
possible, but _must_ be done in consultation with the
infrastructure team.
Regards, Upayavira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Are you guys gonna make a nice video out of it? ;-)
No, you'll need to come over and see it in person :-)
Upayavira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C -
my rationale...
Regards, Upayavira
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sour
James McLaughlin wrote:
> That's great news! I will drink a toast to each and everyone of you
> tonight. Congrats on all your hard work.
Make sure you book your cab early. And arrange some time to recover
tomorrow morning. It is a big team :-)
Regards, Upayavira
> On 6/20/07,
I've often heard it said that us human beings are strange - we often
prefer the familiar to the pleasant.
Upayavira
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:18:24 -0700 (PDT), "Jonathan Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> This was almost exactly my own reaction to the original
The thing I took from Matt's talk was that even if you are going to use
Struts, you shouldn't use Struts 1 - Struts 2 is a much better framework.
Thus, compared against struts itself, struts 1 is itself outdated.
Upayavira
> Erik van Oosten wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
&g
s to what I wouldn't use wicket for? Wicket is a tool for building
sites with complex user interfaces, to manage user interaction. If you
needed to serve large amounts of content from a backend store to
anonymous users, Wicket wouldn't seem the obvious choice (however it
might be for
But, what if 'big' means Ebay, yahoo, etc?
If they came to you saying they wanted to build major public facing
portions of their site in Wicket, would you warn them away?
Upayavira
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Also: when I think about 'big' projects, I think about projects t
te rules in .htaccess files. Would be nice
to have one or two in front of this...)
Regards, Upayavira
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the ch
hey use. So, in Google's case, having
Wicket in the URL would rule Wicket out entirely. Unfortunately, (and
perhaps more importantly) I suspect that could also be the case for
other large corporations.
Upayavira
e various wicket-stuff projects on the
wicket.apache.org site) but the development and documentation for those
projects should be with the project itself, ideally at SourceForge.
Regards, Upayavira
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash
one. If it is
likely to grow into something bigger, or survive for some time, a
separate wiki would be best. IMO.
Regards, Upayavira
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsa
-
however, one might argue that devs might be expected to be a bit more
pro-active.
Anyhow, when the user list moves, we can create the new list and import
the existing users into that list.
Also, when the project moves out of the incubator, that will be a
mailing-list rename, rather than the
form of patches are always welcome
> and might serve as a good starting point for further discussion :)
Heh, well, wouldn't that be nice. I'd love to have some time to do some
open source coding. Instead I just make do with writing emails :-)
Regards, Upayavira
> On 10/20/06
tate).
Is it possible in Wicket to use a hidden field to pass that state
information rather than tacking it onto the URL?
Regards, Upayavira
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get s
n is currently not so very imnportant but, for XHTML
> users, will the
> xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.sourceforge.net/
>
> wicket namespace change too?
If it does, it will change with a major version - 2.
Pierre-Yves Saumont wrote:
> It works much better with http ;-)
Great. https (while it may sometimes work) is really only intended for
use when you are committing.
Regards, Upayavira
-
Using Tomcat but need to do m
/!svn/vcc/default'
> Error: REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': Could not read chunk
> size: A connection has been closed by the distant host.
> (https://svn.apache.org)
Have you tried it via http, rather than https?
Upayavira
. is this behaviour going to
> change in Wicket 2 ??? or are nice URLs there a half-done-feature, too ?
Sounds like you're after stateless pages.
But someone other than me is going to have to tell you about them,
because I've just told you everything I know :-(
Regards, Upayavira
ot use the Wicket name, but they can say "based upon
Wicket".
They can't stop the Wicket code from being distributed, though. And they
presumably can't stop the Wicket committers from being those who know
the code the best.
Upayavira
> On 9/26/06, *Martijn Dashor
o give you real-time
pluggable bundles would be really cool. Plug in a blog, or a forum, or
whatever, without any restarts.
I guess you almost need that sort of functionality if you're going to
compete with PHP stuff.
Regards, Upayavira
o ask.
Congratulations to the Wicket community, I hope it proves to be productive.
Regards, Upayavira
Original Message
Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:30:08 +0100
From: Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: general@incubator
in and restriction.
Once graduated, the current Wicket devs will pretty much be in charge of
their destiny.
Does that answer your questions sufficiently?
Regards, Upayavira
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
re,
and will do my best to make it a smooth ride for all Wicket folks.
I'm now on this list, so feel free to ask any further questions (subject
to SF servers actually delivering mail)
Regards, Upayavira
-
Take Surveys. Earn
I've since gone to 6 and had it working. Curiously, I recall seeing
probems with commons-logging in Jetty 5 preventing it from being able to
run Apache Cocoon. I can understand why they dropped it :-)
Thanks for the pointers.
Regards, Upayavira
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> It has alre
ing a missing log4j. However, lo4j-1.2.13.jar is present in the
$jetty/wicket/WEB-INF/lib directory.
Any ideas what's going on? Without getting past this point I can't even
get to see how cool Wicket might be :-(
Regards, Upayavira
21:11:05.704 INFO [main] org.mortbay.log.LogImpl.add(L
30 matches
Mail list logo
