Ali,
No need to appologize. We /really/ need your feedback, only more
specific ;-). If we don't get feedback, we don't know how to improve
our product.
You are right with your concerns regarding the wicket stuff project and
we will be working on those. If you have concrete suggestions, please
voi
Sorry if my comment has upset anyone, I'm in no mean tried or have
intensions to under-value the effor and favor of the people
contributing to wicket framework, on the opposite, I O them allot, and
I appreciate it allot, wicket is one of the best things in my life now,
and it really got me excited
As a general note: wicket is a community effort. The core developers
need to split their time between building the best framwork possible,
solving bugs, writing documentation, giving support on the
mailinglists, discussing future designs. And *ALL* this in their free
time.
It would help a lot when
A good framework would provide good documentation too :), still I love wicket!!!On 10/12/05, Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Ali Zaid wrote:> Scott Man, Thanks allot, I will try it today, I wonder why a great framework
> like wicket don't have a simple thing like FileDownloadLink() or other>
Ali Zaid wrote:
Scott Man, Thanks allot, I will try it today, I wonder why a great framework
like wicket don't have a simple thing like FileDownloadLink() or other
simple solution.
A good framework doesn't provide you with implementations for all
possible use cases. It should rather make it t
>
> I think the idea is to keep the core as small as possible. As long as
> it is easy for users to build the extensions they need, this is to my
> mind a good idea, as it keeps the core APIs smaller and easier to learn.
I agree. If not part of core, it'd be part of wicket-extension than,
which i
Ali Zaid wrote:
Thanks, It works!
Glad to hear it. You might want to tweak several pieces of the class,
which was written for my specific needs:
- There is a list of file types that show in the browser rather than
download as attachemnts. This is a small list for my own app.
Thanks, It works!On 10/12/05, Ali Zaid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Man, Thanks allot, I will try it today, I wonder why a great
framework like wicket don't have a simple thing like FileDownloadLink()
or other simple solution.On 10/12/05, Scott Sauyet <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Sauyet wr
Scott Man, Thanks allot, I will try it today, I wonder why a great
framework like wicket don't have a simple thing like FileDownloadLink()
or other simple solution.On 10/12/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Sauyet wrote:> Resource resource = new DownloadableFileResource(filename
Scott Sauyet wrote:
Resource resource = new DownloadableFileResource(filename);
add(ResourceLink("fileLink", resource));
Correction, should be:
add(new ResourceLink("fileLink", resource));
^^^
-- Scott
---
This SF.N
Ali Zaid wrote:
I'm kinda lost here, and SourceForge search is not working, so I have to
ask, and I'm sorry if this is a repeated question.
The thing is simple, I need a code snippet of how to use ResourceLink to
inatiate a file download.
There are probably simpler ways to do this, but what
Hi;
I'm kinda lost here, and SourceForge search is not working, so I have to ask, and I'm sorry if this is a repeated question.
The thing is simple, I need a code snippet of how to use ResourceLink to inatiate a file download.
-- Regards, Ali
12 matches
Mail list logo
