As an interested bystander (and hopefully eventual wicket user), I'd say
+1 on a separate wicket-announce list.
dwh
Gwyn Evans wrote:
+1
I'd say Users+Devs+Anns, rather than just Anns, though.
/Gwyn
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by
+1
I'd say Users+Devs+Anns, rather than just Anns, though.
/Gwyn
On 24/08/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik van Oosten wrote:
>
> > The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity.
> > Still I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think?
>
> I
i would say every dev is already also on announce (and i think every
user also)
Can't we if we subscribe to user or dev look it also is on the announce
and if it isn't also subscribe them there?
Then don't do duplicate posts..
Who can post to an announcement?
johan
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
E
Erik van Oosten wrote:
The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity.
Still I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think?
I think it is a sound idea... Are there other users +1 on this?
And how should we do announcents in the future? Only to the announcement
l
The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity. Still
I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think?
Erik.
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Fr