Hi Igor all,
i implemented it the suggested way by using BookmarkablePageLink +
attribute modifier.
For this i havee sub classed the extension tree and have overwritten the
populateTreeItem as followed:
//
Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a page with two frames. The left frame
SelectionFrame contains an extensions Tree and the right frame Main
contains any Contents.
What i now want to do is to respond to the Contents Frame by clicking on
some special tree nodes.
e.g.:
...
Maybe this can help you. At least, I hope...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-frames.html
Marc
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a page with two frames. The left frame
SelectionFrame contains an extensions Tree and the right frame
Hello Marc,
thanks for the quick response. I've read that and also scanned the
wicket examples for frames where a base frame class is used which holds
the target frames...
But i was wondering if there is a easier way to solve this since i do
not need to refresh the top page which holds the
Now I understand what you mean. Not sure it is possible, maybe someone with
more frame and PageMap experience will be able to answer you
In our application, instead of using real frame, we use Dojo which let you
display a page with resizable panel that look like frame. So we display one
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a page with two frames. The left frame
SelectionFrame contains an extensions Tree and the right frame Main
contains any Contents.
What i now want to do is to respond to the Contents Frame by clicking on
In your case: don't use 'internal' links but use bookmarkable links
and call setPageMap(PageMap.forName(Main)) on them. Also, if your
tree is not too large, consider just using some javascript based tree
you your selection frame doesn't have to make round trips.
Eelco
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers
Hello Marc,
thanks for the Dojo information i will check that out for our requirements.
Have you used any Dojo-Wicket framework stuff for this?
Thanks!
Michel
Zitat von Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now I understand what you mean. Not sure it is possible, maybe someone with
more
Nope, we started before the wicket-stuf/dojo project So we ad the JS
and make the stuff directly... (In fact, it is just making div look
correctly for Dojo)
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Marc,
thanks for the Dojo information i will check that out for our
You got an example here even if the code is missing, maybe there is a way of
using it...
http://www.demay-fr.net:8080/WCD13/app/?wicket:bookmarkablePage=wicket-0%3Awicket.contrib.dojo.examples.SplitContainerSample
Marc
On 3/20/07, Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, we started
Thanks Marc!
I will check that tomorrow and call it a day ;-)
Thanks for all your Help to Eelco jim as well - will check that out.
cheers!
Michel
Zitat von Marc-Andre Houle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You got an example here even if the code is missing, maybe there is a way of
using it...
but why use ajax if you are using frames?
all you have to do is make those links bookmarkable and append a target
attribute to them via an attribute modifier
-igor
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a page with two frames. The left frame
Hi Igor,
you're right - we really do not need any AJAX stuff here - i just used
the extension tree and the ajax stuff is there out of the box (if not
explicitely disabled).
As you can see I'm still in a learning phase ;-)
I will switch that tree to use regular links instead and use
The only reason in your case where it might make sense to use Ajax is
when you're tree is really large and you want to load parts of it
lazily. If that's not the case, don't use Ajax.
Eelco
On 3/20/07, Michel Wichers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
you're right - we really do not need any
14 matches
Mail list logo
