Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-23 Thread Al Maw
Maris Orbidans wrote: > I hope it will be fixed. Is there a JIRA issue so we can vote for it ? > > My WEB app. would be 100% valid, if not those ampersands in links. I fixed this in trunk about a week ago. Regards, Al -- Alastair Maw Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com

Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-21 Thread Eelco Hillenius
> I hope it will be fixed. Is there a JIRA issue so we can vote for it ? I think not ATM, but please open up one. As far as I can remember we encode at some places and don't at others, because at some occasions we ran into trouble with that. Dunno, if you open up a JIRA issue, we'll look at it.

Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-21 Thread C. Bergström
Maris Orbidans wrote: >> The problem here is another one - not with wicket tags or attributes, but >> with wicket-generated links. They use a simple ampersand between >> GET-parameters, which should be xml-encoded in an XHTML document (& >> instead of &). >> >> It works in every browser like this,

Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-21 Thread Maris Orbidans
I hope it will be fixed. Is there a JIRA issue so we can vote for it ? My WEB app. would be 100% valid, if not those ampersands in links. Maris Rüdiger Schulz wrote: > The problem here is another one - not with wicket tags or attributes, but > with wicket-generated links. They use a simple am

Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-21 Thread Rüdiger Schulz
The problem here is another one - not with wicket tags or attributes, but with wicket-generated links. They use a simple ampersand between GET-parameters, which should be xml-encoded in an XHTML document (& instead of &). It works in every browser like this, but is not valid XML. -- greetings fr

Re: [Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-19 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I don't know... I would still go for XML schema. DTDs don't know namespaces, so anything you do with them will be a hack imho. Over the last two years, I think various people have made a go at it, and tbh I'm not sure whether anyone had the final working DTD or whether they just gave up on it. Thi

[Wicket-user] validator.w3.org validation

2007-07-06 Thread landtuna
I've seen some unanswered posts on this before, but I figured I'd try again. :) I haven't had much luck in getting my Wicket pages to pass the test on validator.w3.org. (The "live action" examples on wicketstuff.org don't work, either, but that's because they don't specify a DOCTYPE.) I'm usin