but you dont have that kind of visibility. for example if you have a tabbed panel, how do you know what all the different component tab panels will use?-IgorOn 5/12/06,
Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just had an idea: how about require the programmer to inform the current page instance
wat is the possibility of inline scripting like...
On 5/12/06, Bruno Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just had an idea: how about require the programmer to inform the current page instance to "register" all Ajax components he pretends to use, _before_ using them? This way the Ajax component c
i have tested with AttributeModifier to alter the behavior of a particular tag using Ajax via this inline stuff but for small length scripts anyway.
I did it in my own small way.
Created a Model, a Bean with a property which will hold the _javascript_ string and bound using PropertyModel to bind to
I just had an idea: how about require the programmer to inform the current page instance to "register" all Ajax components he pretends to use, _before_ using them? This way the Ajax component could return to the page everything it's going to need and then the page can load .js, .css, whatever in th
well, my concern is to make this automatic.for example:when a component contributes func whatever() { } through that contribution needs to magically merge.
or when a component contributes a { color:red; } that also has to magically get mergedbut from what i have seen there is no way to do that, yo
Hello Igor
not sure how iframes behave here, but it is possible to call
javascript functions in one frame, which is defined in another frame,
which then again can do anything with the calling frame. Done this a
couple of years ago (when frames where still en vogue ;), but as it
turned out, nothing
Looks like there's no problem adding styles. http://www.dynamicdrive.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-3459.htmlThis URL is not quite what it should be for, but demonstrates how CSS's can be changed without reloading a page. And I'm sure the same way new .js files can be added to a Head section dynami
basically what we are talking about is somehow capturing the componnet's header contribution and writing it out.so take datepicker, datepicker.html has a section. what we need to do is to somehow get that portion as a charsequence so that the ajax request target can dump it as part of component's
i dont think this is cool at all because it requires components to provide an alternate output unless we parse the
cool..var script = document.
createElement('script');
script.type = 'text/_javascript_'
;
script.src = 'snip.js';
document.getElementsByTagName('head'
)[0].appendChild(script);
if that works.. that should be doable.johanOn 5/4/06, Igor Vaynberg <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:thanks bruno! i will try t
Not sure I understand what needs to be done. I guess I'll wait until
tomorrow until the "that is how the output must look like" question is
solved.
Juergen
On 5/4/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i guess in this case we need to capture the head output of the component
during ajax re
thanks bruno! i will try to take a look tonight and see if we can adapt these ideas.-IgorOn 5/4/06, Bruno Borges <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I found some links that might be of great interest!
dynamic load _javascript_ from _javascript_
http://www.activewidgets.com/_javascript_.forum.6114.15/dynami
I found some links that might be of great interest!dynamic load _javascript_ from _javascript_
http://www.activewidgets.com/_javascript_.forum.6114.15/dynamic-load-_javascript_-from-_javascript_.htmlDojo Package System
http://dojo.jot.com/WikiHome/Documents/DojoPackageSystem_javascript_ Includeshtt
Ooops. I was wrong.
I just checked some stubs with the w3 validator, and they pass without a
hitch. Both XHTML 1.0 strict and transitional. XHTML 1.1 and 2.0 seem to
be fine as well.
Sorry.
Timo
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
in that case i dont see how you can ever make this work in xhtml unless
i guess there can be a hidden iframe, but then the loaded js will not be part of the page because frames are isolated, no?-IgorOn 5/4/06, Rüdiger Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> in that case i dont see how you can ever make this work in xhtml
> unless you refresh the entire page.A twisted "solu
> in that case i dont see how you can ever make this work in xhtml
> unless you refresh the entire page.
A twisted "solution" using an invisible frame loading only JS comes to
mind ;-)
- Rüdiger
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to s
i guess in this case we need to capture the head output of the component during ajax render and dump it into the markup before the component.Juergen are you reading with us? do you think this is feasible?-Igor
On 5/4/06, Rüdiger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right, and that is the main proble
in that case i dont see how you can ever make this work in xhtml unless you refresh the entire page.-IgorOn 5/4/06, Timo Stamm <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Igor Vaynberg schrieb:> right, and that is the main problem to solve. is a
> right, and that is the main problem to solve. is a
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
right, and that is the main problem to solve. is a
right, and that is the main problem to solve. is a
Igor, I'm not sure if browsers support the "update head" thing (probably not), but one "first step" solution is to notify the component that it is been added through Ajax, so the component must generate a "load" function and return that function name to the Ajax call, so the Ajax JS can call that f
yes, there is a problem indeed with components that need head contribution and are added via ajax. the problem is that when the component is added via ajax its header contribution is ingored because the head section is not updated. so in case of the datepicker the js it needs is never added to the
23 matches
Mail list logo
