Dear Prof Blaha and Wien2k Users,
I am trying to do a fuul Hybrid calculation for CeO2 (cause i did not find
an accurate band gap with mBJ functional). When i did my calculation follow
the user guide for B3LYP or B3PW91 option. I always got this error when
start hf -model -p (** Error in Parallel
Dear Users,After successful attempt of electronic, optical and magnetic
properties, I tried to run Boltztrap calculation.In an alloyed compound with
different doping level concentrations, I encountered below error.
"Error - Fermi level was not found for doping"
Please suggest me:What does it
etreff: Re: [Wien] error in vorb continues...
Dear Gerhard,
I have done 0% reduction during a normal SCF run, while have
done 6% reduction during volume optimization run. No, I have not received any
other error files other than uporb.error.
with regards,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017
What about L2NTV_V.outputorbup, any problematic messages seen in it
similar to "Conflict in atom orb. number" [1]?
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg07531.html
On 7/6/2017 8:46 AM, shamik chakrabarti wrote:
Dear Gerhard,
I have done 0%
2ETEST: .02855000 CTEST: .000366
> LAPW0 END
> LAPW1 END
> LAPW2 END
> CORE END
> MIXER END
> ec cc and fc_conv 1 0 1
> in cycle 13ETEST: .0095 CTEST: .40
> LAPW0 END
> LAPW1 END
> LAPW2 END
> CORE END
> MIXER END
&
c.at><mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>>
代表 Fecher, Gerhard
<fec...@uni-mainz.de<mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de><mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de<mailto:fec...@uni-mainz.de>>>
发送时间: 2017年7月6日 6:06
收件人:
件人: Wien <wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at> 代表 Fecher, Gerhard
<fec...@uni-mainz.de>
发送时间: 2017年7月6日 6:06
收件人: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
主题: Re: [Wien] error in vorb continues...
Does the error appear only during optimization or already in a regular scf
cycle ?
Is your structure correct ? (
[wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von 刘 洋
[ly@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Juli 2017 06:35
An: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Betreff: [Wien] Error information during installation of WIEN2k_16.1 on CentOs7
Dear Everyone,
During installing WIEN2k_16.1, I saw a few
87 Dresden
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von shamik
chakrabarti [shamik...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Juli 2017 07:10
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] error in vorb continues...
Dear wien2k users,
Dear wien2k users,
I am sending this mail again because my earlier mail
requires moderators approval to get posted. I have tried to run volume
optimization of a 56 atomic system using GGA+U approach. I have applied U
to V (4 atoms) & Ni (8 atoms). However, it is failed to run
I still don't see any information that can help pinpoint what went
wrong. So you have to keep looking.
You say "x orb -up/-dn...it is running without any error". If that's
true, I don't think you should be getting that error during the scf
unless perhaps you didn't run those commands on the
I'm not seeing anything that is noticeably problematic with your
case.indmc and case.inorb files. They seem fine.
The "error in vorb" is not informative enough. So you need to check
yourself for further hints of the problem. [
Dear wien2k users,
I have tried to run -eece for a spinel cubic
material. But in the first cycle itself one error appears as;
error: command /home/wien2k/Wien2k_5_7_2015/WIEN2k/lapw0 lapw0.def
failed
> lapw0 -eece (18:43:55) 1.099u 0.065s 0:01.17 98.2% 0+0k
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> <mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>> <mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> <mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>>] im Auftrag von
>> kari
e [physique.kar...@gmail.com
<mailto:physique.kar...@gmail.com>
<mailto:physique.kar...@gmail.com
<mailto:physique.kar...@gmail.com>>]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Mai 2017 00:31
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
B
__
>> Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
>> <mailto:wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>] im Auftrag von
>> karima Physique [physique.kar...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:physique.kar...@gmail.com
com
<mailto:physique.kar...@gmail.com>]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Mai 2017 00:31
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] Error with NMR calculation
I launched the following commands :
run_lapw
x_nmr -mode in1
x_nmr -metal
for NMR calculation of a diamagneti
_
> Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von karima
> Physique [physique.kar...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Mai 2017 00:31
> An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> Betreff: [Wien] Error with NMR calculation
>
> I launched the fo
Von: Wien [wien-boun...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at] im Auftrag von karima
Physique [physique.kar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Mai 2017 00:31
An: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Betreff: [Wien] Error with NMR calculation
I launched the following commands :
run_lapw
x_nmr -mode in1
x_nmr -meta
I launched the following commands :
run_lapw
x_nmr -mode in1
x_nmr -metal
for NMR calculation of a diamagnetic material (metal)
And I got the following error;
EXECUTING: /home/Work/Wien2k/nmrc -case Dia -mode current-green
-scratch ./ -noco-metal
forrtl:
quot;
>
> On Saturday 2017-04-22 02:38, karima Physique wrote:
>
> Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 02:38:36
>> From: karima Physique <physique.kar...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <w...@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.
>> at>
>> To: A Mailing list
ling list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: [Wien] Error with lapw2 -qtl
Dear wien2k users;
I had this error when executing the following command (x lapw2 -qtl -up -hf -p
-redklist) for
Dear wien2k users;
I had this error when executing the following command (x lapw2 -qtl -up -hf
-p -redklist) for calculating dos with hybrid funcional:
The error:
scp: /HFvectorup_1: No such file or directory
scp: /HFvectorup_2: No such file or directory
scp: /HFvectorup_3: No such file or
Probably "normal" behavior. sgroup has found a particular symmetry for
your supercell with the replaced atom and msot likely you should accept
the struct file coming from sgroup.
Am 14.04.2017 um 12:11 schrieb GM RAI:
Dear Wien2k user,
Kindly guide to overcome below error, during super cell
Dear Wien2k user,
Kindly guide to overcome below error, during super cell of CoNiTi. I want
to doped 25% Co with Ni. I set 1x1x4 and replace one atom of Ni out of 4.
Regards
warning: !!! Number of inequivalent atoms has changed. !!! Old value= 8 New
value= 5 warning: !!! Bravais lattice has
The format changed from numbers to keywords (i.e., 28 changed to XC_MBJ).
In WIEN2k 11, indxc in case.in0 was changed manually by hand to 28. In
WIEN2k 14.2, it is automatically changed by the init_mbj_lapw script.
The updates page [1] shows that init_mbj_lapw was updated in WIEN2k
16.1.
In Wien2k_14.2 version
The following procedure sets automatically mBJ calculation:
save your pbe/lda scf calculation and then follow below steps:
1. init_mbj_lapw
2. run_lapw -p -i 1 -NI
3. save_lapw -d "name_of_yr_DIR"
4. init_mbj_lapw
5. select option:0/1/2/3 as you want.
edit case.inm and
Dear Wien2k user
In Wien2k version 11, while applying mBJ method, during SCF.in0, we usually
replace TOT 5 or 28 by 11. But here in the case of 14.2 version we are
unable to locate 5 or 28.
Kindly help, it would be a great help.
--
Dr. G. Murtaza
Assistant Professor
Centre for Advanced Studies
Dear Mr. Elias Assmann
I confirmed with your suggested interactive test that my version of c -
shell does not support -s.
As you recommended, I've now upgraded to tcsh and successfully run x
wannier90 -so for GaAs. Problem fixed.
Thank you very much for your help!
best regards,
Dara Goldar
On 12/04/2016 03:01 PM, Dara Goldar wrote:
> With the following command, I get some information on the version of
> c-shell I am running:
>
> dpkg -l csh
>
>
> ||/ Name Version Description
>
Dear Mr. Elias Assmann
Thank you for your quick reply.
I gave you incorrect information on the operative system I am running, it
is not linux but Ubuntu. Sorry about that.
With the following command, I get some information on the version of
c-shell I am running:
dpkg -l csh
||/ Name
Dear Dara Golda,
On 12/04/2016 12:29 PM, Dara Goldar wrote:
> I am trying to run wien2wannier on a spin-orbit GaAs - case, but
> experiencing problems when running *x wannier90 - so*.
>
> …
(x) w2waddsp: neither mmn nor amn files present -- nothing to do -> exit
> I have however confirmed
Dear win2k-team,
I am trying to run wien2wannier on a spin-orbit GaAs - case, but
experiencing problems when running *x wannier90 - so*.
*Some information that may be helpful:*- I am running wien2k version 14.2
on a machine of type
model: HP EliteBook 8470
architecture: x86_64, intel i7
You did not run initso properly (with spin-polarization). You must
accept the suggested modifications.
A spin-polarized calc with SO cannot have 48 symmetry operations.
Am 09.10.2016 um 03:06 schrieb Wen Fong Goh:
Hi, when I do runsp_lapw -orb -so -cc 0.01, I got an error message
in
an...@iiserb.ac.in>
> Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wien] error in SCF calculation
> To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>
>
> In the *seq-err.txt *file one line number 30 get printed with some
> warning message
Please send the case.scfm.
That it did not exist does not say anything, as with buffered_io the file
is only written when the output that would be written to that file has
exceeded the buffer size for io that is being used.
Did a line number for the fault get printed?
I suspect that this is a
Hello Sir,
I tried with -C option it did not give any further information . The
problem still persist but it gave me case.scfm file now.
Kind Regards,
Paresh
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> Two things:
>
> a) Attach the struct files (e.g.
Please put -C into the compile options and recompile mixer.
It should give you the subroutines and line numbers where the
segmentation fault occurs.
If it does not create any case.scfm, the problem should be very early.
Am 23.09.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Paresh Chandra Rout:
It also says
It also says "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" just before the error and
Yes I commented out the W2kinit call. But it did not generate case.scfm
files. Shall I send the lapack path that I have provided in my .bashrc
files ? Or If any other information you need I can provide to detect the
Does the error have any other information, or is it exactly the same. Did
you comment out the W2kinit call as I asked?
I suspect that there is something wrong with the lapack calls on your HPC
system, but I don't have enough information to say -- I am guessing.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:44 AM,
Hello Sir,
I recompiled through new SRC.mixer as per your suggestion but getting the
same error. I also noticed one thing in that It does not generate
case.scfm file during the calculation. Could that be a problem ? The error
occurs only in wien2k which has installed in the HPC . But, when I
That will work. Afterwards change the compile options back but don't
Recompile.
---
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
http://www.numis.northwestern.edu
Corrosion in 4D
Hello Sir,
Would you please tell me how to compile *only mixe*r with the compilation
options removing -assume buffered_io . Shall
I remove it from compilation options while doing ./siteconfig_lapw and then
only compile mixer ?
Kind Regards
Paresh
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Paresh Chandra
Thank you very much. I will go through your suggestions and let you know .
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> I used your BFO file (some comments later) with the same
> anti-ferromagnetic starting point. I can get essentially the same :DIS
>
I used your BFO file (some comments later) with the same anti-ferromagnetic
starting point. I can get essentially the same :DIS values as you have, but
I do not get an error. Suggestions:
1) Download SRC_mixer from the main Wien2k web page. There might be a bug
that has already been fixed.
2)
Hello Sir,
Here I have attached my case.struct files.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Paresh Chandra Rout <
pareshchan...@iiserb.ac.in> wrote:
> Yes . It was reproducible when I started runsp_lapw after rm *.broy* . But
> to check for the actual error I had started from the beginning again.
Yes . It was reproducible when I started runsp_lapw after rm *.broy* . But
to check for the actual error I had started from the beginning again. Here,
I faced the problem. These calculation were done successfully before.
Suddenly, I start facing the problem. I also checked case.clmvalup/dn but
Two things:
a) Attach the struct files (e.g. BFO.struct & CaRuO3_SP.struct)
b) Send BFO.scf, BFO.scfm and BFO.outputm to my private email (as they may
be too large for the mailing list).
c) In SRC_mixer, do
cp mixer.F mixer.F_hold
then edit mixer.F and put an "!" at the beginning of the line
Unfortunately it is not possible to work this out using what you sent.
Please do
1) cat *.error
If any of the files except mixer.error contain information, that means that
the error occurred there. You will have to analyze what went wrong.
2) Recompile mixer with -traceback (for ifort) added. I
Dear w2k users and developers,
I am facing an error as follows
error: command WIEN2k_14.2_TGZ/mixer mixer.def failed
> stop error
I did not encounter this error before. All my calculation was running fine
with this version of wien2k . I tried to run single point calculation on
three
Dear all,
I am facing an error while running calculation just after LAPW0 . I tried
to solve the error but couldn't do it. Any help would be highly appreciated
. The error message is as follows.
** LAPW1 crashed!
1.644u 8.634s 12:10.23 1.4% 0+0k 16072+352io 66pf+0w
error: command
Your RMT values are far too small. This is a completely wrong structure.
a) It is not Mo2C, but your stoichiometry is 3:1 !
b) Mo-Mo distances should be such that RMTs of at least 1.6-2.0 are
possible.
On 09/01/2016 07:54 AM, Shakeel Khandy wrote:
Dear Sir, The structure File of Mo2C is
Dear Sir, The structure File of Mo2C is mentioned below
Title
H LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 2
194_P63/mmc
MODE OF CALC=RELA
unit=ang
5.692500 5.692500 8.960102 90.00
90.00120.00
ATOM -1: X=0.3000 Y=0.6000 Z=0.2500
MULT= 6 ISPLIT= 8
-1:
Hi
Check the struct file, it's likely to be wrong.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Lyudmila Dobysheva wrote:
> 31.08.2016 10:24, Shakeel Khandy wrote:
>
>> While initilizing Mo2C structure in 194 spacegroup, i got the following
>> error
>> At line 132 of file init.F (unit =
31.08.2016 10:24, Shakeel Khandy wrote:
While initilizing Mo2C structure in 194 spacegroup, i got the following
error
At line 132 of file init.F (unit = 81, file = 'Mo2C.rsp')
Fortran runtime error: End of file
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+16io 0pf+0w
> When i checked the case.ino, it was
Dear Wien2k Users,
Please help me to sort out the propblem.
While initilizing Mo2C structure in 194 spacegroup, i got the following
error
At line 132 of file init.F (unit = 81, file = 'Mo2C.rsp')
Fortran runtime error: End of file
0.0u 0.0s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+16io 0pf+0w
When i checked the
Dear wien2k users,
I am using the ZnO hexagonal struct file whose lattice parameter are
H LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS:
2
MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang
3.25 3.25 5.2 90.00 90.00120.00
ATOM -1: X=0. Y=0.6667
Z=0.
MULT= 2 ISPLIT=
4
ATOM -1:X=
Where in the calculation did the stop message (stop error?) occur? After
orb like in the post at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien%40zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg09135.html
If you search the mailing list archive [
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/maillist.html
],
Do you have an inversion center in your space group?
If yes, you should use a case.indmc file and not case.indm.
Cheers
Xavier
Le 04/08/2016 à 06:36, Shakeel Khandy a écrit :
Dear Xavier
I tried as you suggested, but only case.inorb got created and next it
showed again the same message. Then
Dear Xavier
I tried as you suggested, but only case.inorb got created and next it
showed again the same message. Then i manually created the case.indm file,
the scf runs only a single cycle . Thereafter showing a Stop message
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Xavier Rocquefelte <
Dear Shakeel
You must create two files when initializing a GGA+U (or LDA+U)
calculation, i.e. case.inorb and case.indm (or case.indmc if no
inversion center in the space group).
Normally when you start such a calculation from the w2web interface, the
interface open a template file to allow
Dear Users,
I have tried to run the GGA+U on FeVTiAl, After running a normal GGA cycle
i initialised for GG+ U, But it showed an error message as
Can't read file FeVTiAl_u.indmc.
Only *FeVTiAl.inorb* file is created and then .indm is missing
Please help me to sort out this
With Kind Regards
On 08/01/2016 12:34 PM, Ravi Kashikar wrote:
> Hi Elias
>
> Now I Have tried with w90chk2chk.x utility, its creating case.chk.fmt.
> error is repeating. After x Wannier90 execution. I used *w90chk2chk.x*,
> then *write_inwplot* and *x wplot -wf 1*. which is printing the error, as
w90chk2chk.x
Dear Ravi,
I am copying the Wien2k mailing list for the potential benefit of other
users.
On 07/20/2016 12:52 PM, Ravi Kashikar wrote:
> forrtl: severe (67): input statement requires too much data, unit 32,
> file /home/cmtcl/WIEN2k_cal/NiO/NiO4/nio/nio.chk
>
> Image PC
Dear wien2k users and programmers,
I am trying to run hartree-fock calculations in a monoclinic cell.
I am using the following system :
-wien2k v14.2
-compiled with intel ifort and intel mkl
-on a cluster with intel xeon processors
-running on a single core
In fact, I want to do screened
On 07/05/2016 07:18 PM, Niraj Aryal wrote:
> However, there is something serious thing I am encountering. When I do
> wannier90 calculation after finding case.mmn, case.amn and case.eig (up
> and down spins are added using w2waddsp), it gives me negative spread
> for Omega I e.g:
>
>
Sorry, somehow I did not get the error again. I must have done something
stupid before. I am using intel compiler version 2016.1.150.
However, there is something serious thing I am encountering. When I do
wannier90 calculation after finding case.mmn, case.amn and case.eig (up and
down spins are
Dear Niraj,
On 07/02/2016 02:57 AM, Niraj Aryal wrote:
> Thank you Elias. The newer version of w2w ran without giving any
> errors for test case. I will do more tests and let you know.
Good to hear, and thank you for reporting the compilation error.
> For this, I used the executables from the
Thank you Elias. The newer version of w2w ran without giving any errors for
test case. I will do more tests and let you know.
However, the compilation of executables in SRC_trig directory gave
problems. This gives me error like:
write_win_backend.f(292): error #6460: This is not a field name
Dear Niraj,
On 06/30/2016 08:04 PM, Niraj Aryal wrote:
> Dear Elias
> Thank you for your reply.
> This is full error message I get when I run x w2w -up -so -p
>
> forrtl: severe (39): error during read, unit 9, file
> /home/aryal/work_wein2k/lapw/Zr2Te2P/wannier/./wannier.vectorsoup_1
> Image
Thank you for taking part in this discussion Wasim.
No I have not changed symmetry operation to 1.
On Jul 1, 2016 6:50 AM, "Elias Assmann" wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 07:33 AM, wasim raja Mondal wrote:
> > Have you change symmetry operation 1 before running
>
On 07/01/2016 07:33 AM, wasim raja Mondal wrote:
> Have you change symmetry operation 1 before running init_w2w?
Why would you do that?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Wien mailing list
Thank you for your answer and suggestions.
I tried the same calculation with a ridiculous amount of memory (200GB, while
non so calculations finish easily on 10 GB), and a recompiled lapwso. Nothing
changed unfortunately...
I'm lost now, and have no idea how to approach the problem,
Dear Niraj,
Have you change symmetry operation 1 before running init_w2w?
Thanks
wasim
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Niraj Aryal
wrote:
> Dear Elias
> Thank you for your reply.
> This is full error message I get when I run x w2w -up -so -p
>
> forrtl:
Dear Elias
Thank you for your reply.
This is full error message I get when I run x w2w -up -so -p
forrtl: severe (39): error during read, unit 9, file
/home/aryal/work_wein2k/lapw/Zr2Te2P/wannier/./wannier.vectorsoup_1
Image PCRoutineLine
Source
w2wc
Dear Lyudmila,
Thank you for the reply. I agree that this looks like LAPACK related
stuff. I'm curious though, how does it get there?
My case.inso and case.struct are fine I hope (case.struct is an effect
of geometry optimization, and it looks fine in xcrysden and the forces
are small). See
Dear Niraj Aryal,
Sorry for the delayed reply. I will give my two Euro cents on your
report below. If you have solved the problem in the meantime, please
tell us what it was.
On 06/15/2016 06:37 AM, Niraj Aryal wrote:
> The crystal I am working is Zr2Te2P which has rhombohedral lattice
>
29.06.2016 12:11, Maciej Polak wrote:
I have trouble with running run_lapw with the "so" switch in parallel.
I narrowed down the origin of this error to be located in .timeso_X
files (.timeso_1).
info in pzheevx16 5 2 1
{1,0}: On entry to
PZUNMTR parameter number
Dear WIEN2k Developers and Users,
I have trouble with running run_lapw with the "so" switch in parallel.
What I get is an error:
Missing }.
> stop error
I narrowed down the origin of this error to be located in .timeso_X
files (.timeso_1).
From a brief look at the lapwsopara_lapw
Dear Wien2Wannier developer/ experts
I noticed couple of strange things in w2w . I am reporting this hoping that
it will help the developers /experts to figure out the problem in w2w,
especially for spin orbit coupling case, which has been floating around for
a while.
1)
As I reported here:
Dear wien2wannier developer
I am a novice wien2k user. I am running wien2k version 14.2 compiled with
intel compilers on machine with Centos operating system. I am trying to use
wien2wannier interface to get MLWF. I have been struggling with a strange
bug. I know this bug has been floating around
26.04.2016 04:32, Gavin Abo wrote:
I also saw no errors during the scf cycles (33 iterations) with your
Er2Si3Fe14.struct using WIEN2k 14.2. So one of WIEN2k 14.2 fixes or
improvements [ http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/updates/ ] likely removed
the error that you are getting in version 13.1.
I
You mentioned that you are using WIEN2k 13.1. Try WIEN2k 14.2 + the
fixes to it described in the mailing list. See if the patched WIEN2k
14.2 fixes the problem or not. Refer to clmchange.patch and
symmetso.patch at:
https://github.com/gsabo/WIEN2k-Patches/blob/master/14.2/README
On
Hi dear Gavin abo
I sent for you 3 email including case.inso and case.struct and version
of wien which I run with, but you did not any reply. please help and
guid me about this error
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
- From UG (Chapter 12 )
- : "NO ENERGY LIMITS FOUND IN SELECT":
- This indicates that E top or E bottom could not be found for some u
l(r,E l). Check your input if it happens in the zeroth iteration. Later,
(usually in the second to sixth iteration) it may
28.03.2016 09:05, bhat tahir wrote:
when i tried to calculate the c/a ratio at constant vol.there seems an error
no energy limits found for atom?? 1? L= 1?
?'SELECT' - E-bottom?? -3.72923?? E-top -200.0?
Too small information: struct file, in1 and, maybe, some
dear sir,
when i tried to calculate the c/a ratio at constant vol.there seems an error
no energy limits found for atom?? 1? L= 1?
?'SELECT' - E-bottom?? -3.72923?? E-top -200.0?
___
Wien mailing list
Hi dear all,
I have a problem about my case in GGA+U calculations. My case is
Np0.03Sc0.97PdBi and I made a supercell for this case.These calculations is
in presence of spin-orbit interaction. I had an Error in lapwdm in first
sycle of my calculations. I referenced to this link in mailinglist : "
Datum: 22. 3. 2016 12:34:21
Předmět: [Wien] error in calculation
"
dear sir,
when i tried to calculate the c/a ratio at constant vol.there seems an error
no energy limits found for atom 1 L= 1
'SELECT' - E-bottom -3.72923 E-top -200.0
i want to
dear sir,
when i tried to calculate the c/a ratio at constant vol.there seems an error
no energy limits found for atom 1 L= 1
'SELECT' - E-bottom -3.72923 E-top -200.0
i want to know where to adjust this energy..
___
Wien mailing list
Hi.I think this is due to the following factors:
- set RMT reduction to -1% and mixing factor to 0.1
my greetings **
Nacir GUECHI
Docteur en Physique du solide.Enseignant-Chercheur à l'université du Dr. Yahia
FARES de Médéa, Algeria
Dear all we are facing the following trouble while optimization of spinel
compound.
ERROR status in OPT_vol__-2.0
> stop error
LAPW1 END
LAPW1 END
LAPW0 END
PS: We have did this calculation for -5 0 5 as well but found the same error
Kindly guide to overcome this problem.
Best wishes
OrthoOpt is once again available. Thank you for the report!
--
Eamon McDermott, M.Sc.
Institute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien
eamon.mcderm...@tuwien.ac.at
Office: +43 (1)58801-165304
Meet with me: http://doodle.com/eamon.mcdermott
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 11:29 Tomas Kana wrote:
Dear professor Blaha and co-workers,
Would you please correct the error in the wien2k web page
in the section Unsupported software goodies?
The package OrthoOpt is not available in the link
http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/unsupported/OrthoOpt/
Thank you very much.
Dear all,
Could you please help to resolve the following error during initialization.
n stop error n
error: command /home/casp/Wien2k/nn nn.def failed
0.000u 0.000s 0:00.00 0.0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
/home/casp/Wien2k/nn: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found
(required by
In re "missing symmetry operations": does it really matter? I have been
using such .struct files ever since. After init_lapw, I am always getting
an updated file which already contains the symm ops.
KV
--- x ---
dr. Karel Vyborny
Fyzikalni ustav AV CR, v.v.i.
Cukrovarnicka 10
Praha 6,
Is that really the file? What you sent is not a valid struct file, it is
missing symmetry operations and local rotation matrices. As Fabien said,
you also need to check that there is enough space between the RMTs for the
spheres not to overlap during volume optimisation.
---
Professor Laurence
Probably because of a spheres' overlap for small volumes. You have to
use smaller RMTs. Without providing more details we can not be sure it's
the problem.
F. Tran
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, shamik chakrabarti wrote:
Dear wien2k users,
While running a simulation of a heusler
02.03.2016 14:44, hüsnü kara wrote:
I'm trying to do structure optimization for cubic CH3NH3PbI3. The
program was failed in lapw2:
...
Please, could you help me?
I am afraid nobody can help you. You should send much more information.
Best wishes
Lyudmila Dobysheva
Dear Prof blaha and all
my problem is now resolved.
Thanks
*Dr. K. C. Bhamu(UGC-Dr. D.
S. Kothari Postdoc Fellow)Department of PhysicsGoa University, Goa-403
206IndiaMob. No. +91-9975238952*
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Dr. K. C. Bhamu
501 - 600 of 1189 matches
Mail list logo