Yes Sir, I am using 19.1 version.
Thank you very much !
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 1:21 PM Laurence Marks
wrote:
> It is not an error, it is an informational (info) message that you can
> safely ignore. It appears that your calculation is working fine. The latest
> version (19.2) won't show this
It is not an error, it is an informational (info) message that you can
safely ignore. It appears that your calculation is working fine. The latest
version (19.2) won't show this message, you appear to be using an older
version.
_
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody
I have just installed WIEN2K and trying to do SCF calculation for TiC.
in cycle 15ETEST: .000123255000 CTEST: -.0002173
ec cc and fc_conv 0 1 1
MIXER END
CORE END
LAPW2 END
forrtl: info (530): FILE= specifier ignored when STATUS has value SCRATCH
LAPW1 END
LAPW0 END
hup: Command
As stated in the mailing list guide
http://susi.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/reg_user/mailing_list/
"You need to supply more info (what did you do so far?, what was the
specific task?, what is in the error and output files,... maybe we need the
struct-file, the scf-file or an input-file, as an
Dear Users,
Greetings!
I am using WIEN2k_19.1. When I run scf calculation using WC potential
functional, I found this error.
forrtl: info (530): FILE= specifier ignored when STATUS has value SCRATCH
---
Kindly tell me the solution.
Thanks !
Dear Prof. Marks,
Actually we are trying to estimate the formation energy of RbPbI3 in the
orthorhombic phase and wanted to check its chemical stability.
As RbPbI3 -> RbI + PbI2, we are trying to estimate the energy for RbI and
PbI2 respectively so that we could conclude whether the process is
This is not straightforward.
The leakage is a bit large, and you can avoid it by either increasing the
RMT, doing "touch .lcore" or decreasing the energy during lstart (and/or
using a numerical value, e.g. 0.999). The second uses dstart to put the
tails from the core into the interstitial. All
After the scf calculation of PbI2 system (for both Pb and I RMT is 2.31),
it shows warning in total energy. Then I searched case.scf file and found
":NEC01: NUCLEAR AND ELECTRONIC CHARGE188.0 187.98488
:WAR : NEC01: average large charge leakage: 5.038470138648184E-003
e/atom".
If
Thank you, Prof. Marks and Prof. Gavin for pointing this out. It's now
working fine.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:42 AM Laurence Marks
wrote:
> You positions are wrong -- just look at them! You have PbI6 with
> overlapping atoms because you have 0. for instance, and need
> 0..
>
>
You positions are wrong -- just look at them! You have PbI6 with
overlapping atoms because you have 0. for instance, and need
0..
_
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
Yes, the SELECT error can be due to a bad struct file:
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg04617.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg10860.html
You are correct to post the struct file as the problem is likely do to it.
I see
Dear wien2k users,
I'm trying to calculate the formation energy for RbPbI3. For that, I'm
trying to estimate the energy of PbI2 and RbI. I've already calculated the
energy for RbPbI3.
During the run_lapw step, the following error is encountered. Looking
forward to your kind help.
"hup: Command
an...@iiserb.ac.in>
> Date: Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wien] error in SCF calculation
> To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users <wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
>
>
> In the *seq-err.txt *file one line number 30 get printed with some
> warning message
Please send the case.scfm.
That it did not exist does not say anything, as with buffered_io the file
is only written when the output that would be written to that file has
exceeded the buffer size for io that is being used.
Did a line number for the fault get printed?
I suspect that this is a
Hello Sir,
I tried with -C option it did not give any further information . The
problem still persist but it gave me case.scfm file now.
Kind Regards,
Paresh
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> Two things:
>
> a) Attach the struct files (e.g.
Please put -C into the compile options and recompile mixer.
It should give you the subroutines and line numbers where the
segmentation fault occurs.
If it does not create any case.scfm, the problem should be very early.
Am 23.09.2016 um 17:07 schrieb Paresh Chandra Rout:
It also says
It also says "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" just before the error and
Yes I commented out the W2kinit call. But it did not generate case.scfm
files. Shall I send the lapack path that I have provided in my .bashrc
files ? Or If any other information you need I can provide to detect the
Does the error have any other information, or is it exactly the same. Did
you comment out the W2kinit call as I asked?
I suspect that there is something wrong with the lapack calls on your HPC
system, but I don't have enough information to say -- I am guessing.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:44 AM,
Hello Sir,
I recompiled through new SRC.mixer as per your suggestion but getting the
same error. I also noticed one thing in that It does not generate
case.scfm file during the calculation. Could that be a problem ? The error
occurs only in wien2k which has installed in the HPC . But, when I
That will work. Afterwards change the compile options back but don't
Recompile.
---
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
http://www.numis.northwestern.edu
Corrosion in 4D
Hello Sir,
Would you please tell me how to compile *only mixe*r with the compilation
options removing -assume buffered_io . Shall
I remove it from compilation options while doing ./siteconfig_lapw and then
only compile mixer ?
Kind Regards
Paresh
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Paresh Chandra
Thank you very much. I will go through your suggestions and let you know .
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Laurence Marks
wrote:
> I used your BFO file (some comments later) with the same
> anti-ferromagnetic starting point. I can get essentially the same :DIS
>
I used your BFO file (some comments later) with the same anti-ferromagnetic
starting point. I can get essentially the same :DIS values as you have, but
I do not get an error. Suggestions:
1) Download SRC_mixer from the main Wien2k web page. There might be a bug
that has already been fixed.
2)
Hello Sir,
Here I have attached my case.struct files.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Paresh Chandra Rout <
pareshchan...@iiserb.ac.in> wrote:
> Yes . It was reproducible when I started runsp_lapw after rm *.broy* . But
> to check for the actual error I had started from the beginning again.
Yes . It was reproducible when I started runsp_lapw after rm *.broy* . But
to check for the actual error I had started from the beginning again. Here,
I faced the problem. These calculation were done successfully before.
Suddenly, I start facing the problem. I also checked case.clmvalup/dn but
Two things:
a) Attach the struct files (e.g. BFO.struct & CaRuO3_SP.struct)
b) Send BFO.scf, BFO.scfm and BFO.outputm to my private email (as they may
be too large for the mailing list).
c) In SRC_mixer, do
cp mixer.F mixer.F_hold
then edit mixer.F and put an "!" at the beginning of the line
Unfortunately it is not possible to work this out using what you sent.
Please do
1) cat *.error
If any of the files except mixer.error contain information, that means that
the error occurred there. You will have to analyze what went wrong.
2) Recompile mixer with -traceback (for ifort) added. I
Dear w2k users and developers,
I am facing an error as follows
error: command WIEN2k_14.2_TGZ/mixer mixer.def failed
> stop error
I did not encounter this error before. All my calculation was running fine
with this version of wien2k . I tried to run single point calculation on
three
.
From: pavel.ondra...@email.cz
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:58:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [Wien] error on SCF calculation
Dear Rachida,
the hup: Command not found. line is harmless, however the lapw1c:
Command not found is not.
It looks like the lapw1c doesn't
Dear all,
I'm sorry, i made a careless mistake; lapw1c doesn't exist.
what should I do???
Best regards,
Rachida
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:21:47 +0200
From: pie...@ifp.tuwien.ac.at
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] error on SCF calculation
Dear Rachida,
Pavel
should I do???
Best regards,
Rachida
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:21:47 +0200
From: pie...@ifp.tuwien.ac.at
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] error on SCF calculation
Dear Rachida,
Pavel asked you to check if lapw1c exists - the c at the end is
important!
Does ZnS need
Dear Gavin,
Thank you too much and thank to you all.
my problem is solved :)
Best regards,
Rachida
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:01:31 -0600
From: gs...@crimson.ua.edu
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] error on SCF calculation
1) Run: ./siteconfig
2
the same problem.
I thought it may be due to an error in the installation, if there is a
trick or something to change during installation.
Best regards.
Rachida.
From: pavel.ondra...@email.cz
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:58:52 +0200
Subject: Re: [Wien] error on SCF
33 matches
Mail list logo