Thanks Jérémie,
we are definitely aiming for a more official announcement. The reason for the
soft launch is that, after experimenting for a few months with the DataHub, we
are still reporting to the developers issues that need to be addressed before a
broader announcement. The CKAN data browse
I agree that this sounds like an interesting experiment. I hope that you get
good faith editors. I worry that you’ll get COI editors playing with the search
rankings. Do you have a way in mind to deal with that issue?
Pine
From: emijrp
Sent: Monday, 22 October, 2012 08:29
To: Research into Wi
cc-ed xmldatadumps-l
Hi,
2012/10/23 Dario Taraborelli :
> 2012/10/23 James Forrester :
>> On 22 October 2012 16:03, Hydriz Wikipedia wrote:
>>> I have long been wanting to say this, but is it possible for the team behind
>>> compiling such datasets to put future (and if possible, current) datase
The dumps server was never meant to become a permanent open data repository,
but it started being used as an ad-hoc solution to host all sort of datasets
published by WMF on top of the actual XML dumps: that's the problem we're
trying to fix.
Regardless of where the data is physically hosted
On 22 October 2012 16:03, Hydriz Wikipedia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have long been wanting to say this, but is it possible for the team behind
> compiling such datasets to put future (and if possible, current) datasets
> into dumps.wikimedia.org so that it is easier for everyone to find stuff and
>
Hi all,
I have long been wanting to say this, but is it possible for the team
behind compiling such datasets to put future (and if possible, current)
datasets into dumps.wikimedia.org so that it is easier for everyone to find
stuff and not be all over the place? Thanks for that!
On Tue, Oct 23, 2
We've released a full, anonymized dump of article ratings (aka AFTv4) collected
over 1 year since the deployment of the tool on the entire English Wikipedia
(July 22, 2011 - July 22, 2012).
http://thedatahub.org/en/dataset/wikipedia-article-ratings
The dataset (which includes 11m unique article
Hi all;
I'm starting a new project, a wiki search engine. It uses MediaWiki,
Semantic MediaWiki and other minor extensions, and some tricky templates
and bots.
I remember Wikia Search and how it failed. It had the mini-article thingy
for the introduction, and then a lot of links compiled by a cra
