On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 21:49, Joe Corneli wrote:
> This section fills in some of the gaps left by the statement: "It is not
> only people who do not care for rules, it is also the people who obsess
> about rules."
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarice_Phelps#Wikipedia_article
A little
Thanks for your responses!
I’ll probably be here for the office hour at the end of the month.
My thoughts are that it would be interesting research to do but we’d
probably have to target about ~1 000 editors, to get ~100 responses and/or
post on the village pumps of most English and multilingual
Hi,
I think everyone should be very sensitive around personal data, even more
so of this nature.
As long as we can make the need for the data clear to participants and
those involved, it should be acceptable in my opinion and we can probably
learn things about the project dyamics from such
Thank you for clarifying Jonathan. I am with you when it comes to the
sensitivity of handling any data of this sort (and any personal data, for
that matter).
As to the need for this kind of data, I believe that it is actually
extremely important. I have to say that in 15 years in the movement, I
I don’t think userboxes are the best thing to use as evidence for any claim
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Nick Wilson (Quiddity)
wrote:
> See also
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Health/Mental
> and semi-related
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Personality
