+1 for Stu Geiger's approach. I also like to take an ethnographic approach
to understanding Wikipedia as a project/workspace/community. I used to
conduct a *lot* of interviews with Wikipedia community members, and the
best reference I've found for how to do ethnographic interviewing well is
James
I'd like to also call out the trace ethnography approach that R. Stuart
Geiger and others have used to great effect in studying Wikipedia -- e.g.,
see https://stuartgeiger.com/trace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:47 AM Pablo Aragón wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for sharing this question and the two references. In the field of
Computational Social Science, [1-3] are key references to me, I hope they
inspire you too.
Best,
[1] Salganik, M. J. (2019). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age.
Princeton University Press.
Hello Andrew,
I am not quite sure if this is what you are looking for. A general
framework for Wikipedia research... I wonder how general that can be.
Some authors have tried to make use of systems theory, but this is not
what I would recommend.
It all depends what your research is about, so the
