Re: [Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-10-01 Thread Ziko van Dijk
So Piotr, if I understand you well it is about the question how many of the people who are our contributors according to the statistics (per 5 edits a month, or 100 edits a month) are actually vandals? I could imagine that some vandals manage to make 5 edits before being blocked, or lose interest

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-10-01 Thread Dmitry Chichkov
I think a rough analysis user / IP talk pages could give you a number pretty quickly. You probably would want to do it by hand first and then write a script that analyses the wikipedia dump file. It is doable by hand, if you just sub-sample a few hundred pages randomly. And if normalized by a

[Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-09-29 Thread Piotr Konieczny
Hi everyone, Another question: do we have an estimate of a vandal population? I also asked this at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_%28technical%29#How_many_editors_are_blocked_indefinitely.3F but so far no good estimates have been provided. -- Piotr Konieczny, PhD

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-09-29 Thread h
Hello Piotr, I believe that in Chinese Wikipedia, blocked indefinitely is a user category called Wikipedians that are blocked indefinitely 被永久封禁的維基人 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:%E8%A2%AB%E6%B0%B8%E4%B9%85%E5%B0%81%E7%A6%81%E7%9A%84%E7%B6%AD%E5%9F%BA%E4%BA%BA Its equivalent Wikidata

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-09-29 Thread Piotr Konieczny
I know of the categories, but the problem is that they do not seem to be comprehensive. I can estimate, based on them, that there are at least 150k or so editors who were banned for vandalism, but it seems many vandals do not make it into those categories, suggesting this number is

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Estimate of vandal population

2013-09-29 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
On 29.09.2013 10:04, Piotr Konieczny wrote: I know of the categories, but the problem is that they do not seem to be comprehensive. I can estimate, based on them, that there are at least 150k or so editors who were banned for vandalism, but it seems many vandals do not make it into those