Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation

2017-06-20 Thread Kerry Raymond
rch into Wikimedia content and communities <wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation Thanks for your thoughts, Kerry and Jonathan! Here is some response for your comments. 1. Regarding the targeted projects.

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation

2017-06-20 Thread Bowen Yu
project at various periods after the > invitation is accepted (when is it accepted? See above) > > Kerry > > -Original Message- > From: Wiki-research-l [mailto:wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] > On Behalf Of Jonathan Cardy > Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2017 8:02 PM > To

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation

2017-06-20 Thread Kerry Raymond
research-l [mailto:wiki-research-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Cardy Sent: Tuesday, 20 June 2017 8:02 PM To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities <wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation H

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation

2017-06-20 Thread Jonathan Cardy
Hi Bowen, If you are going to promote wikiprojects by recommendation then you need to test different styles of recommendation. Taking what may still be the two biggest wikiprojects, MILHIST and professional wrestling, what worked as an invitation for either might be quite different than what

Re: [Wiki-research-l] Research about WikiProject Recommendation

2017-06-20 Thread Kerry Raymond
Looking at the list of WikiProjects you pointed at, they seem to be a mixture of what I would call "process" projects (e.g. Articles for Creation, Deletion Sorting) vs "content" projects (e.g. Military History, Television) vs a third group like "Women in Red" (which is part process, part