Jalexander added a comment.
Yeah, I'm not sure if it's actually required (I didn't try registering without)
but it's definitely still marked as required which is probably almost as bad as
it actually being required (will make people who don't want to fill it out
Jalexander added a comment.
We would not be ok with Name, it still makes it sound like it is asking for a
real name.
To be honest it sounds like the 'best' move may just be to get rid of it but if
but if we really think we need it then possibly alternative name/additional
name i
Jalexander added a comment.
>>! In T798#14813, @Qgil wrote:
>>>! In T798#14803, @Jalexander wrote:
>> We would not be ok with Name, it still makes it sound like it is asking for
>> a real name.
>
> If "Name" appears without the asterisk, as an optional
Jalexander added a comment.
>>! In T607#14817, @Qgil wrote:
> @Jalexander, @LuisV_WMF and I have agreed that {T783} goes first.
Aye, just to clarify for later though: The list is probably still a blocker for
us to roll out though (the 1000+ people coming in at the start are just too
Jalexander added a comment.
Could you expand on what you don't understand about the use cases and what, in
your opinion, the UI compromises could be? To be honest I feel like I've
explained it a few times in both the previous task(s) and in past meetings and
so I want to ensure th
Jalexander added a comment.
>>! In T607#10078, @mmodell wrote:
> One thing I can do, at least it doesn't look very difficult at first glance,
> is to enable 'advanced search' on the wiki username field. That would not
> involve any hacks or long term maintenance
Jalexander added a comment.
>>! In T607#10082, @chasemp wrote:
> @Jalexander, really I think you have explained yourself well, but their has
> been a meager amount of time on our side to address it and translate into the
> best possible technical terms. I'm genuinely sorry
