[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2014-09-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 ssas...@wikimedia.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssas...@wikimedia.org --- Comme

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-09-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #13 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 78972 merged by jenkins-bot: Make line breaks in behave like (bug 6200). https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/78972 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 C. Scott Ananian changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #11 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 78972 had a related patch set uploaded by Cscott: Make line breaks in behave like (bug 6200). https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/78972 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Gerrit Notification Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|PATCH_TO_REVIEW Reso

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Tyler Romeo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #10 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 77961 merged by jenkins-bot: Make line breaks in behave like (bug 6200). https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Gerrit Notification Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW -- You are

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Notification Bot --- Change 77961 had a related patch set uploaded by Cscott: Make linebreaks in behave like (bug 6200). https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the as

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 C. Scott Ananian changed: What|Removed |Added CC||canan...@wikimedia.org --- Comment

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #7 from C. Scott Ananian --- I checked this out. The wikitext: Foo bar baz quux does indeed get rendered as: Foo bar baz quux but it's not the parser's fault: it's tidy which is adding the tags. In particular, the 'enclose-b

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2013-08-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 C. Scott Ananian changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #6 from S. McCandlish 2010-07-25 21:45:29 UTC --- Aryeh: Fair enough, but your argument assumes that screen reader users will go with the defaults. For purely presentational markup, that's a "safe" option generally (vision impaired

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|easy| --- Comment #5 from Aryeh Gregor 2010

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #4 from Aryeh Gregor 2010-07-25 18:34:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > ALL of them, as far as I know. I'm unaware of any screen reader that will do > anything with pure-presentation markup (b, i, u, s, font, etc.), which are

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-07-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 S. McCandlish changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||10467 -- Configure bugmail: https://b

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-07-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #3 from S. McCandlish 2010-07-24 23:52:11 UTC --- > I'm curious -- do you have specific examples of popular screen readers where > is treated differently from , and differently from ? ALL of them, as far as I know. I'm unaware o

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2010-06-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 Aryeh Gregor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simetrical+wikib...@gmail.c

[Bug 15491] ins or del 1st occurrence in blockquote causes bogus newline

2009-01-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15491 --- Comment #1 from S. McCandlish 2009-01-13 08:20:04 UTC --- Self-correction! I meant to say: 'Failure to fix this means disuse of semantic markup tags in favor of ones with no semantic meaning at all (u and s), which are ignored by scr