https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Wilfredo RodrÃguez wilfre...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Low |High
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Andre Klapper aklap...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|High|Low
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Patrick Pelletier x...@funwithsoftware.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Michelle Lee Kosik kosi...@mail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kosi...@mail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Jean-Fred jeanfrederic.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||42725
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #18 from Frans Englich fengl...@fastmail.fm 2012-06-26 22:25:50
UTC ---
At Comment #17: I think it makes little sense to add support for proprietary
format because they are not aligned with the principles, purpose and mission of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yan...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #17 from Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com 2012-04-04 21:09:53
UTC ---
Although I think accepting all proprietary camera raw formats is a good idea in
the long run, I think it's unlikely WMF (or the community) would accept a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Bryan Tong Minh bryan.tongm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #14 from Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com 2009-11-28 19:21:20
UTC ---
Following up on this: according to [[:en:Digital Negative (file format)]], DNG
is tentatively planned to be officially supported in the new revision of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #13 from Ilmari Karonen nos...@vyznev.net 2009-08-29 13:14:56
UTC ---
I agree with Derrick: allowing OpenEXR on Commons would also be nice, but it's
not a replacement for DNG (nor vice versa). Comparing them is like comparing
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #10 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2009-08-29 01:41:25 UTC
---
Compatible with existing software?
There is no linux image editing software that supports dng.
OpenEXR, in sharp contrast to DNG, is an open standard, with
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #11 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2009-08-29 02:01:20 UTC
---
http://www.chaosreigns.com/hdr/StLouisArchMultExpHDR.exr
Example OpenEXR file released under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike
3.0 and the GNU Free
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #12 from Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com 2009-08-29 04:15:14
UTC ---
OpenEXR is nice, but it was designed by ILM primarily for digital rendering.
The idea of using it to represent camera raw image files is speculative at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dar...@chaosreigns.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #7 from Ilmari Karonen nos...@vyznev.net 2009-08-26 19:42:39 UTC
---
AFAIK, neither PNG nor (ordinary) TIFF can store undemosaiced, high-bit-depth
raw sensor data. That's the point of using the DNG format on Commons: saving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #8 from Darxus dar...@chaosreigns.com 2009-08-26 20:37:51 UTC ---
Full bit depth raw sensor data (12 or 14 bits?) can be stored in a 16 bit per
channel png with an ICC color profile matching the camera. No level
quantization,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #9 from Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com 2009-08-26 20:42:58
UTC ---
Although in theory the pixel data from a raw image file could be stored in a
PNG/TIFF, with transparent pixels for missing pixels, the main problem with
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #3 from Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org 2009-06-23 00:25:08 UTC
---
Proposal link is broken; can you provide an updated link? Thanks!
I'd also tend to strongly recommend that some inline thumbnailing ability exist
before
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
JeLuF je...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||je...@gmx.de
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
--- Comment #2 from Derrick Coetzee d...@moonflare.com 2009-06-11 07:57:35
UTC ---
Oops, excuse my naivity. DNG files are TIFF files, but with additional
DNG-specific tags; they can be identified by the presence of a DNGVersion tag.
See
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
^demon innocentkil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||shell
--
25 matches
Mail list logo
