https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #58 from S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com 2010-07-29 07:03:10
UTC ---
Aughhh! [coughing up skull] I wish they'd quit mucking around with this stuff
and leave it alone. I've lodged a gripe about this change at the public W3C
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #59 from Liangent liang...@gmail.com 2010-07-29 07:40:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #58)
a href=http://www.savetubevideo.com;download video/a
What's this link?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #60 from S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com 2010-07-29 17:46:57
UTC ---
--- Comment #59 from Liangent liang...@gmail.com 2010-07-29 07:40:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #58)
a href=http://www.savetubevideo.com;download video/a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #61 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2010-07-29
18:54:08 UTC ---
Whitelisted dfn in r70164. Let's keep the remaining three in this bug, no
need to proliferate bugs unnecessarily. kbd and samp are waiting on the
W3C
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #56 from S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com 2010-07-29 01:30:26
UTC ---
Aryeh, in Comment #52:
Definitely proper in HTML5
http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/address.html
Nope, definitely improper, see above. It represents
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #57 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca 2010-07-28 23:56:58 CDT
---
(In reply to comment #56)
Aryeh, in Comment #52:
Definitely proper in HTML5
http://www.w3.org/TR/html-markup/address.html
Nope, definitely improper, see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #52 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2010-07-26
13:24:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #50)
Regarding use cases for the address element, I forgot to mention the best one:
to mark up a talk-page user sig.
This is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #53 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca 2010-07-26 10:03:29 CDT
---
(In reply to comment #52)
(In reply to comment #50)
Regarding use cases for the address element, I forgot to mention the best
one:
to mark up a talk-page
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #54 from Christopher Yeleighton giecr...@stegny.2a.pl 2010-07-26
16:15:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #51)
* On other stuff:
--- Comment #48 from Christopher Yeleighton 2010-07-25 08:42:53 UTC ---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #55 from ABX abx...@gmail.com 2010-07-26 16:25:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
I would say it could convert the first reflexive link in the
intro section of the article body to a DFN equally well, therefore allowing
DFN
is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #48 from Christopher Yeleighton giecr...@stegny.2a.pl 2010-07-25
08:42:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
* On the idea of applying dfn with a template to the boldfaced term at the top
of an article's lead (e.g.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #49 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2010-07-25
18:39:44 UTC ---
Sigh. Okay, frankly, I wasn't really so much against whitelisting these, and I
was mostly just responding to particular arguments that I thought were
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #50 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca 2010-07-25 13:53:33 CDT
---
Regarding use cases for the address element, I forgot to mention the best one:
to mark up a talk-page user sig.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #51 from S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com 2010-07-25 21:31:04
UTC ---
* On dfn and address:
--- Comment #49 from Aryeh Gregor 2010-07-25 18:39:44 UTC ---
[reasonable summary of the debate, elided]
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|22905 |
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|8633|
--
Configure
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||19719
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||10467
--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #43 from Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikib...@gmail.com 2010-07-22
17:24:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
The lack of the dfn element is a particular thorn in my side on Wikipedia
right
now, in reality and not in theory, as WP
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #44 from Michael Zajac mich...@zajac.ca 2010-07-22 13:38:19 CDT
---
The address element gives contact information for the author of the page.
Since wiki pages are, by their nature, not owned by anyone or authored by any
single
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #45 from Christopher Yeleighton giecr...@stegny.2a.pl 2010-07-22
19:33:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #37)
abbr instead. kbd and samp are basically useless. q is dodgy because
No, they are useful, albeit a limited domain. If
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
--- Comment #46 from Christopher Yeleighton giecr...@stegny.2a.pl 2010-07-22
20:48:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
Off the top of my head, an address element could be appropriate in the
following places:
* In the page footer, for the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671
S. McCandlish smccandl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easy
23 matches
Mail list logo
